<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Science And Technology</title>
    <description>Science And Technology</description>
    <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/</link>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41420) From the moon and every other opaque body.</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41420</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;From the moon and every other opaque body.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:31:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41420</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41419) Isn't there always a solar eclipse in space from the moon, if yo...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41419</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Isn't there always a solar eclipse in space from the moon, if you're in the&lt;br /&gt;right spot?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:22:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41419</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41418) Space Weather News for Feb. 21, 2012</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41418</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Feb. 21, 2012&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SOLAR ECLIPSE FROM SPACE: Earlier today the new Moon passed in front of the&lt;br /&gt;sun, producing a solar eclipse visible from space.  High-resolution images of&lt;br /&gt;the event captured by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory are featured on the&lt;br /&gt;Feb. 21st edition of http://spaceweather.com.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:57:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41418</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41417) Space Weather News for Feb. 19, 2012</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41417</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Feb. 19, 2012&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;AURORA SURPRISE:  A solar wind stream hit Earth's magnetic field on  Feb. 18th,&lt;br /&gt;sparking a surprisingly widespread display of auroras.  Northern Lights crossed&lt;br /&gt;the Canadian border and descended as far south as Nebraska in the United&lt;br /&gt;States.  Photographs of the display and speculation about what made the solar&lt;br /&gt;wind impact so potent are featured on today's edition of&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:11:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41417</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41416) Jonathan's Space Report</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41416</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Jonathan's Space Report&lt;br /&gt;No. 654                                       2012 Feb 18  Somerville, MA USA&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Space Station&lt;br /&gt;-------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Expedition 30 continues with Soyuz TMA-22 docked at Poisk and Soyuz&lt;br /&gt;TMA-03M docked to the Rassvet module. At about 0h on Feb 12 a switching&lt;br /&gt;unit reset on the truss cut off power to solar array 3B and to one of&lt;br /&gt;the Z1 control gyros; the systems were restored later that day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flight Engineer-3 Kononenko and FE-1 Shkaplerov made a spacewalk from&lt;br /&gt;the Pirs module on Feb 16 using suits Orlan-MK No. 4 and No. 6&lt;br /&gt;respectively. They relocated the `Strela' GStM-1 crane from Pirs to&lt;br /&gt;Poisk and installed the Vinoslivost materials exposure experiment.&lt;br /&gt;Installation of some SMDP space debris protection panels on Zvezda was&lt;br /&gt;deferred to a later occasion because the crane move took longer than&lt;br /&gt;expected. The Pirs airlock was depressurized from 1408 to 2049 UTC&lt;br /&gt;(6hr41min) and the hatch was open from 1431 to 2046 UTC (6h15min). At&lt;br /&gt;1904 UTC the MLI cover for the Poisk Strela baseplate was jettisoned&lt;br /&gt;into orbit; it has not yet been cataloged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Book Note  - &amp;quot;Rockets and People&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fourth and final volume of Boris Chertok's memoirs, with a&lt;br /&gt;NASA-sponsored English translation edited by Asif Siddiqi, has now been&lt;br /&gt;published. This volume covers the Soviet side of the race to land humans&lt;br /&gt;on the Moon, with inside stories of the N-1/L-3 launch attempts.&lt;br /&gt;All four volumes are highly recommended.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Iranian satellite&lt;br /&gt;------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Iran reports that it has launched the Navid-e Elm-o Sanat satellite into&lt;br /&gt;low orbit on Feb 3. It carries a panchromatic imager, possibly developed&lt;br /&gt;by the Iranian Univ. of Sci. and Technology (IUST, or in Persian,&lt;br /&gt;Daneshgah Elm-o Sanat Iran), Tehran. Another report says that the&lt;br /&gt;satellite was built by Tehran's  Sharif University of Technology&lt;br /&gt;(Daneshgah-e Sanati-ye Sharif).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The satellite's name means something like &amp;quot;Promise (Herald, Gospel, Good&lt;br /&gt;News, Harbinger)  of Science and  Technology&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Orbital data from US tracking shows Navid and the Safir second stage&lt;br /&gt;rocket in a 275 x 374 km x 56.0 deg orbit, and analysis indicates&lt;br /&gt;a launch at around 0004 UTC on Feb 3.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vega&lt;br /&gt;----&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ESA's new small satellite launch vehicle, Vega, made its first flight&lt;br /&gt;successfully on Feb 13.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vega has three solid motor stages, P80FW, Zefiro 23, and the Zefiro 9A&lt;br /&gt;third stage. The Zefiro stages are built by Avio spA of Colleferro,&lt;br /&gt;Italy. Avio's main space motor plant was  originally the Bombrini Parodi&lt;br /&gt;Delfino explosives factory (1912-1994) and later part of Fiat&lt;br /&gt;(1994-2003); I believe their first space motor was a communications&lt;br /&gt;satellite apogee motor built for the Europa rocket and later used for&lt;br /&gt;ESA's Geos-1. A Ukrainian-built RD-869 engine is used in the Avio fourth&lt;br /&gt;stage, the Attitude and Vernier Upper Module (AVUM), which uses liquid&lt;br /&gt;propellants (UDMH/N2O4). P80FW is  developed by the Europropulsion joint&lt;br /&gt;venture (Avio plus France's SNECMA). The overall launch vehicle is&lt;br /&gt;produced by ELV SpA, a joint venture of Avio and the Italian space&lt;br /&gt;agency ASI.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The LARES 'Laser Relativity Satellite' is the primary payload. The 390&lt;br /&gt;kg, 0.38m dia. tungsten sphere studded with 92 laser retroreflectors&lt;br /&gt;will be used as a test particle to probe relativistic effects in the&lt;br /&gt;Earth's gravitational field. Stefan Barensky informs me that LARES is&lt;br /&gt;claimed to have the lowest ballistic coefficient of any satellite&lt;br /&gt;launched to date (this means its orbit will be very stable); I estimate&lt;br /&gt;the BC is around  0.0011 m**2/kg but would be interested to hear other&lt;br /&gt;estimates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The next largest payload is AlmaSat-1, a 12.5 kg student satellite&lt;br /&gt;from the University of Bologna, which will test a cold gas microthruster system&lt;br /&gt;and the platform for a future Earth observing satellite.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Lares Support System, attached to the AVUM, can be considered an&lt;br /&gt;additional payload, as it includes extensive instrumentation to monitor&lt;br /&gt;the launch. It also deployed seven 1U Cubesats from three P-POD&lt;br /&gt;deployers. P-POD 1 contained XaTcobeo, from the University of Vigo;&lt;br /&gt;`e-st@r' from the Politecnico di Torino; and ROBUSTA from the&lt;br /&gt;Universite' de Montpellier 2. P-POD 2 ejected MaSat-1 from the Budapest&lt;br /&gt;University of Technology and Economics; Goliat from the University of&lt;br /&gt;Bucharest; and PW-Sat-1 from the Warsaw Inst. of Technology&lt;br /&gt;(Politechnika Warszawska). P-POD 3 carried UNICubeSat-GG, from U. Roma&lt;br /&gt;La Sapienza, which has a gravity gradient experiment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Vega booster took off from the Ensemble de Lancement Vega (ELV) at&lt;br /&gt;Kourou and headed northeast. The Zefiro 9A third stage burnt out at 1005&lt;br /&gt;UTC and entered a marginal orbit (one estimate is around -30 x  775 km;&lt;br /&gt;another solution from the limited data available is around 50-60 km x&lt;br /&gt;250-500 km; I asked ESA but they haven't responded yet). The stage&lt;br /&gt;probably reentered at first perigee at around 1112 UTC south of New&lt;br /&gt;Zealand, and has not been cataloged. The AVUM stage first burn was&lt;br /&gt;completed at 1008 UTC and probably reached an orbit of around 180 x 1450&lt;br /&gt;km (ESA have not annouced the details of the ascent trajectory). At 1048&lt;br /&gt;UTC the AVUM second burn began and resulted in a 1435 x 1452 km x 69.5&lt;br /&gt;deg orbit; LARES was released into this orbit at 1055 UTC. At 1106-1110&lt;br /&gt;UTC AVUM's third burn lowered the perigee resulting in an orbit of&lt;br /&gt;around 310 x 1441 km. At  1110 UTC the three P-PODs released their&lt;br /&gt;cargo. Finally at 1111 UTC AlmaSat was ejected, and the AVUM vented its&lt;br /&gt;remaining propellant, ending up in a 272 x 1431 km x 69.5 km orbit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SES-4&lt;br /&gt;-----&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SES-4 satellite was launched on Feb 14 aboard an ILS Proton from&lt;br /&gt;Baykonur. The 6180 kg Loral-1300 spacecraft will replace NSS 7 at 22 West.&lt;br /&gt;The satellite is owned by SES Satellite Leasing (UK) and will be transferred&lt;br /&gt;to SES World Skies (based in the Hague) once in its target orbit.&lt;br /&gt;The Briz-M stage reached a 3640 x 35762 km x 24.5 deg orbit; by Feb 17&lt;br /&gt;SES-4 was in an 8946 x 35759 km x 13.4 deg.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suborbital launches&lt;br /&gt;-------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Armadillo Aerospace launched its LOX/ethanol STIG-A rocket from New Mexico's&lt;br /&gt;Spaceport America on Jan 28, reaching the edge of space at 82 km.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Swedish SSC agency's MASER 12 microgravity payload&lt;br /&gt;made a suborbital flight from the ESRANGE site at Kiruna, Sweden,&lt;br /&gt;using a Brazilian VSB-30 rocket launched from the old Skylark launch&lt;br /&gt;tower first used in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table of Recent (orbital) Launches&lt;br /&gt; ----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Date UT       Name            Launch Vehicle  Site            Mission    INTL.&lt;br /&gt;                                                                         DES.&lt;br /&gt;Jan  9 0317   ZY-3        )     Chang Zheng 4B     Taiyuan           Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;01A&lt;br /&gt;             Vesselsat 2 )                                          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;01B&lt;br /&gt;Jan 13 0056   FY-2(07)          Chang Zheng 3A     Xichang           Weather  &lt;br /&gt;02A&lt;br /&gt;Jan 20 0038   WGS 4             Delta 4M+(5,4)     Canaveral SLC37B  Comms    &lt;br /&gt;03A&lt;br /&gt;Jan 24 2318   Chibis-M          -                  PM-13M, LEO       Science  &lt;br /&gt;62C&lt;br /&gt;Jan 25 2306   Progress M-14M    Soyuz-U            Baykonur LC1      Cargo    &lt;br /&gt;04A&lt;br /&gt;Feb  3 0004?  Navid             Safir              Semnan            Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;05A&lt;br /&gt;Feb 13 1000   LARES   )         Vega               Kourou ELV        Geodesy  &lt;br /&gt;06A&lt;br /&gt;             Almasat )                                              Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06B&lt;br /&gt;             XaTcobeo )                                             Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06&lt;br /&gt;             ROBUSTA  )                                             Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06&lt;br /&gt;             e-st@r   )                                             Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06&lt;br /&gt;             Goliat   )                                             Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06&lt;br /&gt;             PWSat-1  )                                             Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06&lt;br /&gt;             MaSat-1  )                                             Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06&lt;br /&gt;             UNICubeSat-GG )                                        Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06&lt;br /&gt;             LARES Support Sys)                                     Tech     &lt;br /&gt;06K&lt;br /&gt;Feb 14 1936   SES-4              Proton-M/Briz-M   Baykonur LC200/39 Comms    &lt;br /&gt;07A&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table of Recent (suborbital) Launches&lt;br /&gt;----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Date UT     Payload/Flt Name  Launch Vehicle  Site                   Mission&lt;br /&gt;Apogee/km&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jan 11 1325   NASA 12.074GT    Terrier Malemute   Wallops             Test&lt;br /&gt;  500?&lt;br /&gt;Jan 12 1451   S-520-26         S-520              Uchinoura           Atm Sci&lt;br /&gt;  298&lt;br /&gt;Jan 28 1815   STIG-A-III       STIG-A             Spaceport America   Test&lt;br /&gt;   82&lt;br /&gt;Feb 10 0440   Target           Prithvi            Chandipur           Target&lt;br /&gt;  100&lt;br /&gt;Feb 13 0932   MASER 12         VSB-30             ESRANGE             Micrograv&lt;br /&gt;  260&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;..-------------------------------------------------------------------------.&lt;br /&gt;|  Jonathan McDowell                 |  phone : (617) 495-7176            |&lt;br /&gt;|  Somerville MA 02143               |  inter : planet4589 at gmail       |&lt;br /&gt;|  USA                               |          jcm@cfa.harvard.edu       |&lt;br /&gt;|                                                                         |&lt;br /&gt;| JSR: http://www.planet4589.org/jsr.html                                 |&lt;br /&gt;| Back issues:  http://www.planet4589.org/space/jsr/back                  |&lt;br /&gt;| Subscribe/unsub: http://www.planet4589.org/mailman/listinfo/jsr         |&lt;br /&gt;'-------------------------------------------------------------------------'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:38:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41416</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41415) http://news.discovery.com/space/earth-has-two-moons-111222.html</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41415</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://news.discovery.com/space/earth-has-two-moons-111222.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EARTH MUST HAVE ANOTHER MOON, SAY ASTRONOMERS&lt;br /&gt;The way our planet temporarily captures asteroids suggests Earth should have at&lt;br /&gt;least one extra moon at any one time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thu Dec 22, 2011 09:15 AM ET&lt;br /&gt;Content provided by FoxNews.com/SciTech&lt;br /&gt;(16)B Comments&lt;br /&gt;THE GIST&lt;br /&gt;        b&amp;quot;      Asteroids captured by our planet essentially become extra&lt;br /&gt;moons, say astronomers.&lt;br /&gt;        b&amp;quot;      At any given time, there should be at least one extra&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;temporary moon&amp;quot; in our orbit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;enlarge&lt;br /&gt;Is there another &amp;quot;moon&amp;quot; out there? Astronomers say yes...sort of. Click to&lt;br /&gt;enlarge this image. b(&lt;br /&gt;Maybe Frank should have sung &amp;quot;Fly Me to the Moons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;Scientists studying satellites orbiting the planet have come to an astounding&lt;br /&gt;conclusion: Earth has multiple moons at any given time, the MIT Technology&lt;br /&gt;Review reported.&lt;br /&gt;Mikael Granvik, along with colleagues at the University of Hawaii, first&lt;br /&gt;discovered a mysterious body orbiting the Earth in 2006. The object -- or RH120&lt;br /&gt;as it was known -- turned out to be a tiny asteroid just a few meters across.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, it was a natural satellite just like our moon.&lt;br /&gt;NEWS: Earth May Have Had Two Moons&lt;br /&gt;Since then, the researchers have been studying how this &amp;quot;Earth-Moon&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;gravitational system captures bodies into its orbit while also modelling their&lt;br /&gt;frequency and duration. The asteroid RH120 for instance was captured in&lt;br /&gt;September 2006 and orbited the planet until June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;But how often do these &amp;quot;temporary moons&amp;quot; actually occur? Quite often, the&lt;br /&gt;astronomers found.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;At any given time, there should be at least one natural Earth satellite of&lt;br /&gt;one-meter diameter orbiting the Earth,&amp;quot; Granvik, Jeremie Vaubaillon and Robert&lt;br /&gt;Jedicke wrote in &amp;quot;The Population of Natural Earth Satellites,&amp;quot; a paper&lt;br /&gt;published in online physics journal ArXiv.org.&lt;br /&gt;In other words, at this very moment, our planet likely has a secret moon&lt;br /&gt;orbiting us (no word as to whether it's a blue moon). Such objects typically&lt;br /&gt;stay for about 10 months, making three revolutions around the planet.&lt;br /&gt;NEWS: Subterranean Living May Await Moon and Mars Colonists&lt;br /&gt;Given that these tiny captured orbitals are only a meter or two in diameter, it&lt;br /&gt;may seem a stretch to officially call them &amp;quot;moons&amp;quot; -- but the scientific&lt;br /&gt;implications of the discovery are vast. Outside of assisting private&lt;br /&gt;spaceflight and exploring deep space, the other major thing on NASA's list of&lt;br /&gt;things to do is send astronauts to an asteroid.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The scientio,c potential of being able to o,rst remotely characterize a&lt;br /&gt;meteoroid and then visit and bring it back to Earth would be unprecedented,&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;the research team concluded.&lt;br /&gt;Read more about Earth's second moon at the MIT Technology Review.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:51:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41415</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41414) http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/02/02/new-alien-planet-is-pe...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41414</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/02/02/new-alien-planet-is-perfect-for-life-&lt;br /&gt;scientists-say/?intcmp=obinsite&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New alien planet is perfect for life, scientists say&lt;br /&gt;By Denise Chow&lt;br /&gt;Published February 02, 2012&lt;br /&gt;| Space.com&lt;br /&gt;                b(Carnegie Institution for Scienceb(An artist's conception of&lt;br /&gt;the alien planet GJ 667Cc, which is located in the habitable zone of its parent&lt;br /&gt;star.&lt;br /&gt;A potentially habitable alien planet -- one that scientists say is the best&lt;br /&gt;candidate yet to harbor water, and possibly even life, on its surface -- has&lt;br /&gt;been found around a nearby star.&lt;br /&gt;The planet is located in the habitable zone of its host star, which is a narrow&lt;br /&gt;circumstellar region where temperatures are neither too hot nor too cold for&lt;br /&gt;liquid water to exist on the planet's surface.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It's the Holy Grail of exoplanet research to find a planet around a star&lt;br /&gt;orbiting at the right distance so it's not too close where it would lose all&lt;br /&gt;its water and boil away, and not too far where it would all freeze,&amp;quot; Steven&lt;br /&gt;Vogt, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz, told&lt;br /&gt;SPACE.com. &amp;quot;It's right smack in the habitable zone -- there's no question or&lt;br /&gt;discussion about it. It's not on the edge, it's right in there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;Vogt is one of the authors of the new study, which was led by Guillem&lt;br /&gt;Anglada-EscudC) and Paul Butler of the Carnegie Institution for Science, a&lt;br /&gt;private, nonprofit research organization based in Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This planet is the new best candidate to support liquid water and, perhaps,&lt;br /&gt;life as we know it,&amp;quot; Anglada-EscudC) said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;An alien super-Earth&lt;br /&gt;The researchers estimate that the planet, called GJ 667Cc, is at least 4.5&lt;br /&gt;times as massive as Earth, which makes it a so-called super-Earth. It takes&lt;br /&gt;roughly 28 days to make one orbital lap around its parent star, which is&lt;br /&gt;located a mere 22 light-years away from Earth, in the constellation Scorpius&lt;br /&gt;(the Scorpion).&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This is basically our next-door neighbor,&amp;quot; Vogt said. &amp;quot;It's very nearby. There&lt;br /&gt;are only about 100 stars closer to us than this one.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly enough, the host star, GJ 667C, is a member of a triple-star&lt;br /&gt;system. GJ 667C is an M-class dwarf star that is about a third of the mass of&lt;br /&gt;the sun, and while it is faint, it can be seen by ground-based telescopes, Vogt&lt;br /&gt;said. [Gallery: The Strangest Alien Planets]&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The planet is around one star in a triple-star system,&amp;quot; Vogt explained. &amp;quot;The&lt;br /&gt;other stars are pretty far away, but they would look pretty nice in the sky.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;The discovery of a planet around GJ 667C came as a surprise to the astronomers,&lt;br /&gt;because the entire star system has a different chemical makeup than our sun.&lt;br /&gt;The system has much lower abundances of heavy elements (elements heavier than&lt;br /&gt;hydrogen and helium), such as iron, carbon and silicon.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It's pretty deficient in metals,&amp;quot; Vogt said. &amp;quot;These are the materials out of&lt;br /&gt;which planets form -- the grains of stuff that coalesce to eventually make up&lt;br /&gt;planets -- so we shouldn't have really expected this star to be a likely case&lt;br /&gt;for harboring planets.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;The fortuitous discovery could mean that potentially habitable alien worlds&lt;br /&gt;could exist in a greater variety of environments than was previously thought&lt;br /&gt;possible, the researchers said.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Statistics tell us we shouldn't have found something this quickly this soon&lt;br /&gt;unless there's a lot of them out there,&amp;quot; Vogt said. &amp;quot;This tells us there must&lt;br /&gt;be an awful lot of these planets out there. It was almost too easy to find, and&lt;br /&gt;it happened too quickly.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;The detailed findings of the study will be published in the Astrophysical&lt;br /&gt;Journal Letters.&lt;br /&gt;An intriguing star system&lt;br /&gt;Another super-Earth that orbits much closer to GJ 667C was previously detected&lt;br /&gt;in 2010, but the finding was never published, Vogt added. This planet, called&lt;br /&gt;GJ 667Cb, takes 7.2 days to circle the star but its location makes it far too&lt;br /&gt;hot to sustain liquid water on its surface.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It's basically glowing cinders, or a well-lit charcoal,&amp;quot; Vogt said. &amp;quot;We know&lt;br /&gt;about a lot of these, but they're thousands of degrees and not places where you&lt;br /&gt;could live.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;But, the newly detected GJ 667Cc planet is a much more intriguing candidate, he&lt;br /&gt;said.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;When a planet gets bigger than about 10 times the size of the Earth, there's a&lt;br /&gt;runaway process that happens, where it begins to eat up all the gas and ice in&lt;br /&gt;the disk that it's forming out of and swells quickly into something like&lt;br /&gt;Uranus, Jupiter or Saturn,&amp;quot; Vogt explained. &amp;quot;When you have a surface and the&lt;br /&gt;right temperature, if there's water around, there's a good chance that it could&lt;br /&gt;be in liquid form. This planet is right in that sweet spot in the habitable&lt;br /&gt;zone, so we've got the right temperature and the right mass range.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;Preliminary observations also suggest that more planets could exist in this&lt;br /&gt;system, including a gas giant planet and another super-Earth that takes about&lt;br /&gt;75 days to circle the star. More research will be needed to confirm these&lt;br /&gt;planetary candidates, as well as to glean additional details about the&lt;br /&gt;potentially habitable super-Earth, the scientists said.&lt;br /&gt;Finding nearby alien planets&lt;br /&gt;To make their discovery, the researchers used public data from the European&lt;br /&gt;Southern Observatory combined with observations from the W.M. Keck Observatory&lt;br /&gt;in Hawaii and the new Carnegie Planet Finder Spectrograph at the Magellan II&lt;br /&gt;Telescope in Chile.&lt;br /&gt;Follow-up analyses were also made using a planet-hunting technique that&lt;br /&gt;measures the small dips, or wobbles, in a star's motion caused by the&lt;br /&gt;gravitational tug of a planet.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;With the advent of a new generation of instruments, researchers will be able&lt;br /&gt;to survey many M dwarf stars for similar planets and eventually look for&lt;br /&gt;spectroscopic signatures of life in one of these worlds,&amp;quot; Anglada-EscudC) said&lt;br /&gt;in a statement. Anglada-EscudC) was with the Carnegie Institution for Science&lt;br /&gt;when he conducted the research, but has since moved on to the University of&lt;br /&gt;Gottingen in Germany.&lt;br /&gt;With the GJ 667C system being relatively nearby, it also opens exciting&lt;br /&gt;possibilities for probing potentially habitable alien worlds in the future,&lt;br /&gt;Vogt said, which can't easily be done with the planets that are being found by&lt;br /&gt;NASA's prolific Kepler spacecraft.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The planets coming out of Kepler are typically thousands of light-years away&lt;br /&gt;and we could never send a space probe out there,&amp;quot; Vogt said. &amp;quot;We've been&lt;br /&gt;explicitly focusing on very nearby stars, because with today's technology, we&lt;br /&gt;could send a robotic probe out there, and within a few hundred years, it could&lt;br /&gt;be sending back picture postcards.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;                Gallery: The Smallest Alien Planets&lt;br /&gt;                Kepler Reveals Lots of Planets: Some Habitable?&lt;br /&gt;                A Galaxy Full of Alien Planets (Infographic)&lt;br /&gt;Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This&lt;br /&gt;material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:49:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41414</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41413) http://dsc.discovery.com/gear-gadgets/nasa-finds-lost-spacecraft...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41413</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://dsc.discovery.com/gear-gadgets/nasa-finds-lost-spacecraft-on-dark-side-o&lt;br /&gt;f-the-moon.html#mkcpgn=otbn1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NASA Finds Lost Spacecraft on Dark Side of the Moon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jerry James Stone&lt;br /&gt;Mon Aug 8, 2011 04:21 PM ET&lt;br /&gt;(44)B Comments&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Photo via NASA&lt;br /&gt;NASA scientists have found the crash site, pictured above, of a spacecraft set&lt;br /&gt;into orbit during the early 60s. This one-thankfully-is not crawling with&lt;br /&gt;Decepticons. They believe it is the missing Lunar Orbiter 2 which disappeared&lt;br /&gt;back in 1967 during a passage over the far side of the moon, when the craft&lt;br /&gt;went out of telescope and radio range.&lt;br /&gt;Lunar Orbit 2b2s primary function was documenting areas of the moon that would&lt;br /&gt;be most hospitable to the Apollo and Surveyor missions. During its run, it&lt;br /&gt;returned a total of 609 high resolution images and 208 medium-sized frames.&lt;br /&gt;This includes the Copernicus crater (pictured below) which is considered by&lt;br /&gt;many to be the Picture of the Century.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Photo via NASA&lt;br /&gt;While the spacecraft was intentionally downed on October 11, 1967, scientists&lt;br /&gt;had yet to find the crash site-til now.&lt;br /&gt;The wreckage is thought to have been located by the Lunar Reconnaissance&lt;br /&gt;Orbiter (LRO) which is currently mapping the lunar surface in unprecedented&lt;br /&gt;detail. During its mission so far, the spacecraft has gathered more than 192&lt;br /&gt;terabytes of data; that's nearly 41,000 DVDs worth of data, images and maps!&lt;br /&gt;One of its key findings is our solar system's coldest spot: a crater near the&lt;br /&gt;moon's north pole was recorded at minus 415 degrees Fahrenheit. Brrr!&lt;br /&gt;Some of the images LRO has captured can be seen below, but you can also find&lt;br /&gt;more here.&lt;br /&gt;Follow me @jerryjamesstone or friend me on Facebook.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Photo via NASA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Photo via NASA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:24:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41413</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41412) Jonathan's Space Report</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41412</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Jonathan's Space Report&lt;br /&gt;No. 653                                       2012 Jan 30 Somerville MA USA&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Space Station&lt;br /&gt;-------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Expedition 30 continues with Soyuz TMA-22 docked at Poisk and Soyuz&lt;br /&gt;TMA-03M docked to the Rassvet module. Progress M-13M undocked from the&lt;br /&gt;Pirs module on Jan 23 at 2210 UTC into a 375 x 405 km orbit. It made two&lt;br /&gt;burns to reach a 493 x 508 km orbit, and ejected the Chibis-M scientific&lt;br /&gt;microsatellite at 2318 UTC on Jan 24. Progress M-13M was then deorbited at&lt;br /&gt;0225 UTC on Jan 25 into a 56 x 514 km orbit. It entered&lt;br /&gt;the atmosphere at 0304 UTC, with the debris falling in the South Pacific at&lt;br /&gt;0318 UTC. Progress M-14M was launched on Jan 25 and docked with the&lt;br /&gt;Pirs module at 0009 UTC on Jan 28.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FOBOS-GRUNT REENTRY&lt;br /&gt;-------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At 1636 UTC on Jan 15, FG's orbit was 112 x 124 km x 51.4 deg.&lt;br /&gt;According to the Russian `space control network' the spacecraft was&lt;br /&gt;expected to have reentered about 1745 UTC on Jan 15, over the Pacific&lt;br /&gt;Ocean. Other reports from the Russian `ballistics' calculations&lt;br /&gt;suggested a slightly later reentry predicted at 1759 UTC over Goias&lt;br /&gt;state in Brazil.   On Jan 23 Space-Track released an estimate reported&lt;br /&gt;that entry at 80 km was at 1746 UTC +/- 1 min, off the coast of Chile at&lt;br /&gt;46S 87W; this estimate seems likely to be reliable and is probably&lt;br /&gt;derived from DSP infrared sensors (and at least gets credit for quoting&lt;br /&gt;an error bar). The quoted location matches the final element set's&lt;br /&gt;ground track at about 1746:40 UTC - I will combined that estimated&lt;br /&gt;time with the quoted 1 minute error bar.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Jan 25 ESA announced a reentry time at 10 km of 1745&lt;br /&gt;UTC, with an uncertainty of +/-7.5 min (1 sigma; personal communication&lt;br /&gt;from Heiner Klinkrad). Adopting ESA's estimated descent time of 7&lt;br /&gt;minutes from 80 km to 10 km, this corresponds to an 80 km reentry at&lt;br /&gt;1738 UTC +/- 7.5min, consistent with the Space-Track value within the quoted&lt;br /&gt;uncertainties,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately you can't use the standard orbit propagators to figure out&lt;br /&gt;what geographical position the 10-km-altitude time corresponds to, since&lt;br /&gt;the atmosphere slows the debris down a lot. Models of the UARS reentry&lt;br /&gt;suggested that the denser debris, which might survive reentry, impacts&lt;br /&gt;800 to 1200 km downrange from the 80 km point. Taking that as a model&lt;br /&gt;for FG, and including the +/- 1 minute error range for the initial&lt;br /&gt;starting point around 1746:40UTC,  I derive a range of 84W 45S to 71W&lt;br /&gt;38S for the likely position of dense debris impact based on the&lt;br /&gt;Space-Track (USSTRATCOM) data. This region is in the south-east Pacific&lt;br /&gt;and stretches  across the Chilean coast north of Valdivia and across the&lt;br /&gt;Araucania region. to just short of the Chilean/Argentine border&lt;br /&gt;northeast of Temuco. Taking the centers of the relevant ranges gives a&lt;br /&gt;point just off  the Chilean coast, near 76W 41S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I believe it is likely that all the debris hit the ocean, but it's also&lt;br /&gt;entirely possible that some pieces reached the ground in the Araucania&lt;br /&gt;region of Chile. Only about 100 kg of the 13000 kg satellite was&lt;br /&gt;expected to reach the Earth's surface according to Russian sources,&lt;br /&gt;while the remainder would have burned up and melted high in the upper&lt;br /&gt;atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As you can see, even ten days post-reentry for a well studied event, it&lt;br /&gt;can be tough to figure out exactly where a  spacecraft came down when it&lt;br /&gt;has undergone natural reentry from an atmosphere-skimming circular&lt;br /&gt;orbit. This may be contrasted with deliberate deorbits from higher&lt;br /&gt;altitude, like the Progress M-13M entry, where the steep angle of entry&lt;br /&gt;into the atmosphere yields a well-understood time and location.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WGS 4&lt;br /&gt;-----&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The 4th Wideband Global Satcom satellite was launched on Jan 20&lt;br /&gt;into supersynchronous geostationary transfer orbit. The Boeing 702 satellite&lt;br /&gt;provides high bandwidth communications for the US military&lt;br /&gt;and is operated by US Army Space Command.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chinese launches&lt;br /&gt;----------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Jan 9 the zi yuan san hao (ZY-3) mapping satellite was launched,&lt;br /&gt;together with the small 28 kg VesselSat 2, built by LuxSpace for&lt;br /&gt;Orbcomm's AIS (maritime vessel tracking) system. On Jan 13 ZY-3 was in a&lt;br /&gt;498 x 506 km x 97.5 deg orbit, Vesselsat-2 in a 489 x 500 km orbit and&lt;br /&gt;the CZ-4B third stage in a 219 x 487 km orbit. The second Chinese launch&lt;br /&gt;this month was the fengyun erhao 07 xing (FY-2 satellite 07), also&lt;br /&gt;called FY-2F. This geostationary weather satellite was launched to a 362&lt;br /&gt;x 35773 km x 24.3 deg geostationary transfer orbit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GRAIL and NPP&lt;br /&gt;---------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The two GRAIL lunar satellites have been renamed Ebb and Flow, following&lt;br /&gt;a competition in which school students suggested names. The NPP weather&lt;br /&gt;satellite has been renamed Suomi NPP after Verner Suomi (1915-1995) who&lt;br /&gt;was a pioneer of NASA's early weather satellites and flew the&lt;br /&gt;first cloud cover sensors on Vanguard 2 and Tiros 1.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Passing rock&lt;br /&gt;-------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asteroid 2012 BX34 made a close approach to Earth in a 59023 x -80873 km&lt;br /&gt;x 80.18 deg hyperbolic orbit (C3 = 87.7 km**2/s**2) at 1525 UTC on Jan&lt;br /&gt;27, over about 150W 56S. This is sufficiently above GEO altitude that it&lt;br /&gt;probably didn't come too close to any satellites (the closest pass&lt;br /&gt;I've found was to OGO 1 at 19000 km distance). It missed Chandra&lt;br /&gt;by 173000 km - phew!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suborbital launches&lt;br /&gt;-------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The second Terrier/Improved Malemute flight was launched on Jan 11. The&lt;br /&gt;T/IM is an uprated version of the Terrier Malemute developed by Sandia&lt;br /&gt;Labs, which made at least 46 flights between 1974 and 2004. I'm still&lt;br /&gt;waiting to hear what apogee the new flight reached. JAXA's S-520-26&lt;br /&gt;launch from Uchinoura released three lithium clouds for upper atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;studies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the last JSR I missed the Dec 10 launch of Webster Cash's CODEX mission,&lt;br /&gt;NASA 36.274UH, which was flown to get soft X-ray spectra of the Vela&lt;br /&gt;region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table of Recent (orbital) Launches&lt;br /&gt; ----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Date UT       Name            Launch Vehicle  Site            Mission    INTL.&lt;br /&gt;                                                                         DES.&lt;br /&gt;Dec  1 2107   Beidou DW10       Chang Zheng 3A     Xichang           Navsat   &lt;br /&gt;73A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 11 1117   Amos  5  )        Proton-M/Briz-M    Baykonur          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;74A&lt;br /&gt;             Luch 5A  )                                             DataRelay&lt;br /&gt;74B&lt;br /&gt;Dec 12 0121   JSE Reda-3 gouki  H-IIA 202          Tanegashima       Radar    &lt;br /&gt;75A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 17 0203   Pleiades HR1 )    Soyuz ST-A         CSG ELS           Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;76A&lt;br /&gt;             Elisa 1      )                                         Sigint   &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;             Elisa 2      )                                         Sigint   &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;             Elisa 3      )                                         Sigint   &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;             Elisa 4      )                                         Sigint   &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;             Fasat-Charlie)                                         Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;Dec 19 1641   Nigcomsat 1R      Chang Zheng 3BE    Xichang LC2       Comms    &lt;br /&gt;77A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 21 1316   Soyuz TMA-03M     Soyuz-FG           Baykonur LC1      Spaceship&lt;br /&gt;78A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 22 0326   ZY-1 02C          Chang Zheng 4B     Taiyuan           Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;79A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 23 1208   Meridian          Soyuz-2-1B         Plesetsk          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;F04&lt;br /&gt;Dec 28 1709   Globalstar M084)  Soyuz-2-1A         Baykonur LC31     Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80A&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar M080)                                       Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80B&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar M082)                                       Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80C&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar M092)                                       Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80D&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar M090)                                       Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80E&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar M086)                                       Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80F&lt;br /&gt;Jan  9 0317   ZY-3        )     Chang Zheng 4B     Taiyuan           Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;01A&lt;br /&gt;             Vesselsat 2 )                                          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;01B&lt;br /&gt;Jan 13 0056   FY-2(07)          Chang Zheng 3A     Xichang           Weather  &lt;br /&gt;02A&lt;br /&gt;Jan 20 0038   WGS 4             Delta 4M+(5,4)     Canaveral SLC37B  Comms    &lt;br /&gt;03A&lt;br /&gt;Jan 24 2318   Chibis-M          -                  PM-13M, LEO       Science  &lt;br /&gt;62C&lt;br /&gt;Jan 25 2306   Progress M-14M    Soyuz-U            Baykonur LC1      Cargo    &lt;br /&gt;04A&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table of Recent (suborbital) Launches&lt;br /&gt;----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Date UT     Payload/Flt Name  Launch Vehicle  Site                   Mission&lt;br /&gt;Apogee/km&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dec  2 2200   VS30 V08         VS-30              Natal               Space&lt;br /&gt;sci?   173?&lt;br /&gt;Dec  3 0721   ICI-3            VS-30/Orion        Svalbard            Auroral&lt;br /&gt;  354&lt;br /&gt;Dec 10 1030   NASA 36.274UH    Black Brant IX     White Sands         Astronomy&lt;br /&gt;  300?&lt;br /&gt;Dec 19?       MR-30 payload    MR-30              Kapustin Yar        Test&lt;br /&gt;  304&lt;br /&gt;Dec 20 0848   S-310-40         S-310              Uchinoura          &lt;br /&gt;Ionosphere   180&lt;br /&gt;Dec 23        RV x 6?          Bulava             K-535, White Sea    Salvo&lt;br /&gt;test  1000?&lt;br /&gt;Dec 23        RV x 6?          Bulava             K-535, White Sea    Salvo&lt;br /&gt;test  1000?&lt;br /&gt;Dec 27 1200   RV x 6?          UR-100NU           Baykonur            Test&lt;br /&gt; 1000?&lt;br /&gt;Jan 11 1325   NASA 12.074GT    Terrier Malemute   Wallops             Test&lt;br /&gt;  500?&lt;br /&gt;Jan 12 1451   S-520-26         S-520              Uchinoura           Atm Sci&lt;br /&gt;  298&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;..-------------------------------------------------------------------------.&lt;br /&gt;|  Jonathan McDowell                 |  phone : (617) 495-7176            |&lt;br /&gt;|  Somerville MA 02143               |  inter : planet4589 at gmail       |&lt;br /&gt;|  USA                               |          jcm@cfa.harvard.edu       |&lt;br /&gt;|                                                                         |&lt;br /&gt;| JSR: http://www.planet4589.org/jsr.html                                 |&lt;br /&gt;| Back issues:  http://www.planet4589.org/space/jsr/back                  |&lt;br /&gt;| Subscribe/unsub: http://www.planet4589.org/mailman/listinfo/jsr         |&lt;br /&gt;'-------------------------------------------------------------------------'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:51:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41412</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41411) Space Weather News for Jan. 27, 2012</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41411</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Jan. 27, 2012&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;X-FLARE:  Earth-orbiting satellites detected a powerful X2-class solar flare&lt;br /&gt;today, Jan. 27th, at 1837 UT (1:37 pm EST). The source was departing sunspot&lt;br /&gt;1402.  The blast produced a spectacular CME (not Earth directed) and&lt;br /&gt;accelerated energetic protons toward Earth.  A low-level radiation storm is now&lt;br /&gt;in progress around our planet. Visit http://spaceweather.com for images and&lt;br /&gt;updates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:20:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41411</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Vlad Tepes/41410) i don't understand why usa governments keep saying they have to ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41410</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;i don't understand why usa governments keep saying they have to &amp;quot;explore&amp;quot; new&lt;br /&gt;forms of transportstion energy when it has existed for years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Chrysler, Ford, GM, Honda, Nissan and Toyota also produced limited numbers of&lt;br /&gt;electric cars for drivers in California, USA. In 2003, upon the expiration of&lt;br /&gt;GM's EV1 leases, GM crushed them. The crushing has variously been attributed to&lt;br /&gt;1) the auto industry's successful federal court challenge to California's&lt;br /&gt;zero-emissions vehicle mandate, 2) a federal regulation requiring GM to produce&lt;br /&gt;and maintain spare parts for the few thousands EV1s and 3) the success of the&lt;br /&gt;oil and auto industries' media campaign to reduce public acceptance of electric&lt;br /&gt;vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A movie made on the subject in 2005-2006 was titled Who Killed the Electric&lt;br /&gt;Car? and released theatrically by Sony Pictures Classics in 2006. The film&lt;br /&gt;explores the roles of automobile manufacturers, oil industry, the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;government, batteries, hydrogen vehicles, and consumers, and each of their&lt;br /&gt;roles in limiting the deployment and adoption of this technology.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;it would be a simple matter to pull out the blueprints and rebuild the cars, et&lt;br /&gt;voila.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 03:19:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41410</guid>
      <author>Vlad Tepes@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(The After Party/41409) Giraffe</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41409</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Giraffe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  Yeah. Was off of chile. Just wondering if I could have seen in streaking&lt;br /&gt;  across the sky...oh well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:59:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41409</guid>
      <author>The After Party@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41408) I think the impact was on the other side of South America -- off...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41408</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;I think the impact was on the other side of South America -- off of Chile. But&lt;br /&gt;the reports are not specific.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:45:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41408</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(The After Party/41407) Phobos-Grunt</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41407</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Phobos-Grunt&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  Damn, I'm in Brasil (near Rio) and I forgot about this. I wonder if&lt;br /&gt;  I could have seen anything..probably not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:54:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41407</guid>
      <author>The After Party@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41406) NASA Science News for Jan. 13, 2012</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41406</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Jan. 13, 2012&lt;br /&gt;A distant super-Earth named &amp;quot;55 Cancri e&amp;quot; is wetter and weirder than&lt;br /&gt;astronomers thought possible. The discovery has researchers re-thinking the&lt;br /&gt;nature of alien worlds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/13jan_r&lt;br /&gt;ethink/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A video version of this story is available at&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_CZCmJ2om0&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:10:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41406</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41405) NASA Science News for Jan. 12, 2012</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41405</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Jan. 12, 2012&lt;br /&gt;Astronomers are still scratching their heads over Comet Lovejoy, which plunged&lt;br /&gt;through the atmosphere of the sun in December and, against all odds, survived.&lt;br /&gt;The comet is now receding into the outer solar system leaving many mysteries&lt;br /&gt;behind.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/12jan_c&lt;br /&gt;ometlovejoy/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A video version of this story is available at&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w75lBn1QIaI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:20:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41405</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Peccavimus/41404) Awww!  How cute!</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41404</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Awww!  How cute!&lt;br /&gt;Can we keep it?  Huh?  Can we?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:26:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41404</guid>
      <author>Peccavimus@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41403) NASA Science News for Jan. 11, 2012</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41403</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Jan. 11, 2012&lt;br /&gt;NASA's Kepler spacecraft has discovered the tiniest solar system so far: a red&lt;br /&gt;dwarf star with three rocky planets smaller than Earth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/11jan_s&lt;br /&gt;mallestexoplanets/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:14:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41403</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41402) Jonathan's Space Report</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41402</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Jonathan's Space Report&lt;br /&gt;No. 652                                        2012 Jan  8  Austin, Texas, USA&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;-&lt;br /&gt;The Earth made its annual closest approach to the Sun at about 0030 UTC on Jan&lt;br /&gt;5.&lt;br /&gt;A happy perihelion to all my readers!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Space Station&lt;br /&gt;-------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Launch of the Soyuz TMA-03M spaceship from Baykonur with Oleg Kononenko,&lt;br /&gt;Andre Kuipers and Don Pettit occurred on Dec 21. The ship docked&lt;br /&gt;with the Rassvet module at 1519 UTC on Dec 23.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meridian failure&lt;br /&gt;-----------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Launch of the fifth Meridian military communcations&lt;br /&gt;satellite from Plesetk failed on Dec 23, once again putting the&lt;br /&gt;Soyuz-2-1b launch vehicle in doubt. The Blok-I third stage&lt;br /&gt;malfunctioned 7 min 1 s after launch, a couple of minutes short&lt;br /&gt;of orbit insertion. Blok-I with the Fregat upper stage and the payload&lt;br /&gt;crashed near Novosibirsk.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It has been reported that this was the first launch under the auspices&lt;br /&gt;of the VVKO  (Voyska Vosdushno-Kosmicheskoi Oborona, Aerospace Defence&lt;br /&gt;Forces), which on Dec 1 officially replaced the KVR (Russian Space&lt;br /&gt;Forces), although Aleksandr Zheleznakyov (personal comm.) says that&lt;br /&gt;the Nov 28 launch was actually the first for Voiska VKO. (The intermediate&lt;br /&gt;launches were civilian ones performed by the Roskosmos).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GRAIL&lt;br /&gt;-----&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The GRAIL-A and GRAIL-B spacecraft entered lunar orbit on Dec 31 and Jan&lt;br /&gt;1. The planned capture orbits were 88 x 8378 km x 87.2 deg for GRAIL-A,&lt;br /&gt;and 111 x 8359 km x 88.3 deg for GRAIL-B. According to&lt;br /&gt;spaceflightnow.com the actual orbit for GRAIL-A is 90 x 8362 km.&lt;br /&gt;The GRAIL probes will now maneuver close to each other to begin their&lt;br /&gt;gravity mapping mission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Globalstar&lt;br /&gt;-----------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Six Globalstar low orbit telecom satellites were launched on Dec 28 on a&lt;br /&gt;Soyuz-2-1a from Plesetk. The successful launch by Roskosmos was a relief&lt;br /&gt;coming only days after the Soyuz-2-1b failure, which may - perhaps -&lt;br /&gt;be isolated to the RD-0124 engine that's unique to the 1b variant.&lt;br /&gt;I don't yet have the serial numbers for the six satellites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PSSC-2&lt;br /&gt;------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Aerospace Corporation's  PSSC Testbed 2 picosatellite, ejected from&lt;br /&gt;mission STS-135, reentered on Dec 8. The 4 kg satellite carried four&lt;br /&gt;tiny model-rocket motors to raise its orbit. One of those was fired on&lt;br /&gt;Nov 4 at around 1530 UTC and raised the orbit slightly from 90.9 min,&lt;br /&gt;317 x 319 km to 91.0 min, 316 x 329 km, delaying decay by about 4 days.&lt;br /&gt;Based on the otherwise steady orbital decay rate, it appears that the&lt;br /&gt;remaining motors were not fired.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ZY-1 02C&lt;br /&gt;--------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;China launched the Ziyuan yihao 02C satellite from Taiyuan on Dec 22.&lt;br /&gt;The satellite carries imaging cameras with a resolution of 2.4m.&lt;br /&gt;The two earlier ZY-1 satellites were launched as part of a joint&lt;br /&gt;Sino-Brazilian program (CBERS), but this one appears to be all-Chinese.&lt;br /&gt;China also has a ZY-2 series, thought to be used for defense related&lt;br /&gt;imaging, while ZY-1 is used for civilian mapping and resource monitoring.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tiangong and X-37&lt;br /&gt;-----------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The USAF's X-37B OTV spaceplane launched in Mar 2011 remains in orbit.&lt;br /&gt;However, contrary to some recent media reports, its mission is unrelated&lt;br /&gt;to observations of the Tiangong-1 spacelab; the orbital planes of&lt;br /&gt;the two vehicles are perpendicular.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Erratum&lt;br /&gt;-------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, Cassini's been in Saturn orbit since 2004 Jul 1, not 2005 - that&lt;br /&gt;should teach me not to send out JSR at 3am in future.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suborbital flights&lt;br /&gt;------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Dec 23 the Russian Navy carried out a launch of two Bulava missiles&lt;br /&gt;from the submarine Yuriy Dolgorukiy, according to Pavel Podvig's&lt;br /&gt;site russianforces.org. Each missile carried&lt;br /&gt;several (probably six) reentry vehicles which flew from the White Sea to&lt;br /&gt;the Kura test range in Kamchatka.&lt;br /&gt;On Dec 27, a UR-100NU rocket was launched from Baykonur to Kura&lt;br /&gt;carrying an experimental reentry vehicle.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table of Recent (orbital) Launches&lt;br /&gt; ----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Date UT       Name            Launch Vehicle  Site            Mission    INTL.&lt;br /&gt;                                                                         DES.&lt;br /&gt;Nov  4 1251   Glonass-M No. 43) Proton-M/Briz-M    Baykonur LC81     Navsat   &lt;br /&gt;64A&lt;br /&gt;             Glonass-M No. 44)                                      Navsat   &lt;br /&gt;64B&lt;br /&gt;             Glonass-M No. 45)                                      Navsat   &lt;br /&gt;64C&lt;br /&gt;Nov  8 2016   Fobos-Grunt       Zenit-2SB          Baykonur LC45    Mars probe&lt;br /&gt;65A&lt;br /&gt;Nov  9 0321   Yaogan Weixing 12) Chang Zheng 4B    Taiyuan           Imaging? &lt;br /&gt;66B&lt;br /&gt;             Tianxun 1        )                                     Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;66A&lt;br /&gt;Nov 14 0414   Soyuz TMA-22      Soyuz-FG           Baykonur LC1      Spaceship&lt;br /&gt;67A&lt;br /&gt;Nov 20 0015   Shiyan Weixing 4 ) Chang Zheng 2D    Jiuquan           Tech?    &lt;br /&gt;68B&lt;br /&gt;             Chuanxin 1-03    )                                     Tech     &lt;br /&gt;68A&lt;br /&gt;Nov 25 1910   Asiasat 7         Proton-M/Briz-M    Baykonur LC200/39 Comms    &lt;br /&gt;69B&lt;br /&gt;Nov 26 1502   MSL               Atlas V 541        Canaveral SLC41  Mars probe&lt;br /&gt;70A&lt;br /&gt;Nov 28 0826   Glonass-M No. 46  Soyuz-2-1B         Plesetsk LC43     Navsat   &lt;br /&gt;71A&lt;br /&gt;Nov 29 1850   Yaogan Weixing 13 Chang Zheng 2C     Taiyuan           Radar?   &lt;br /&gt;72A&lt;br /&gt;Dec  1 2107   Beidou DW10       Chang Zheng 3A     Xichang           Navsat   &lt;br /&gt;73A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 11 1117   Amos  5  )        Proton-M/Briz-M    Baykonur          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;74A&lt;br /&gt;             Luch 5A  )                                             DataRelay&lt;br /&gt;74B&lt;br /&gt;Dec 12 0121   JSE Reda-3 gouki  H-IIA 202          Tanegashima       Radar    &lt;br /&gt;75A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 17 0203   Pleiades HR1 )    Soyuz ST-A         CSG ELS           Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;76A&lt;br /&gt;             Elisa 1      )                                         Sigint   &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;             Elisa 2      )                                         Sigint   &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;             Elisa 3      )                                         Sigint   &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;             Elisa 4      )                                         Sigint   &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;             Fasat-Charlie)                                         Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;76&lt;br /&gt;Dec 19 1641   Nigcomsat 1R      Chang Zheng 3BE    Xichang LC2       Comms    &lt;br /&gt;77A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 21 1316   Soyuz TMA-03M     Soyuz-FG           Baykonur LC1      Spaceship&lt;br /&gt;78A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 22 0326   ZY-1 02C          Chang Zheng 4B     Taiyuan           Imaging  &lt;br /&gt;79A&lt;br /&gt;Dec 23 1208   Meridian          Soyuz-2-1B         Plesetsk          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;F04&lt;br /&gt;Dec 28 1709   Globalstar  )     Soyuz-2-1A         Baykonur LC31     Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80A&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar  )                                          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80B&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar  )                                          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80C&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar  )                                          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80D&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar  )                                          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80E&lt;br /&gt;             Globalstar  )                                          Comms    &lt;br /&gt;80F&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Table of Recent (suborbital) Launches&lt;br /&gt;----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Date UT     Payload/Flt Name  Launch Vehicle  Site                   Mission&lt;br /&gt;Apogee/km&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nov  2 0750   RV               Jericho III        Palmachim           Test&lt;br /&gt;  300?&lt;br /&gt;Nov  3 0645   RV               Topol'             Plesetsk            Test&lt;br /&gt; 1000?&lt;br /&gt;Nov  6        NASA 36.264UH    Black Brant 9      White Sands         Astronomy&lt;br /&gt;  250?&lt;br /&gt;Nov 15 0330   Agni RV          Agni IV            Chandipur           Test&lt;br /&gt;  900&lt;br /&gt;Nov 17 1130   AHW Flight 1A    STARS              Kauai LC42         &lt;br /&gt;Hypersonic  1000?&lt;br /&gt;Nov 25 2300   Orion V05        Orion              Natal               Test&lt;br /&gt;  100?&lt;br /&gt;Nov 27 0910   TEXUS 48         VSB-30             Kiruna              Micrograv&lt;br /&gt;  270?&lt;br /&gt;Dec  2 2200   VS30 V08         VS-30              Natal               Space&lt;br /&gt;sci?   173?&lt;br /&gt;Dec  3 0721   ICI-3            VS-30/Orion        Svalbard            Auroral&lt;br /&gt;  354&lt;br /&gt;Dec 19?       MR-30 payload    MR-30              Kapustin Yar        Test&lt;br /&gt;  304&lt;br /&gt;Dec 23        RV x 6?          Bulava             K-535, White Sea    Salvo&lt;br /&gt;test  1000?&lt;br /&gt;Dec 23        RV x 6?          Bulava             K-535, White Sea    Salvo&lt;br /&gt;test  1000?&lt;br /&gt;Dec 27 1200   RV               UR-100NU           Baykonur            Test&lt;br /&gt; 1000?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;..-------------------------------------------------------------------------.&lt;br /&gt;|  Jonathan McDowell                 |  phone : (617) 495-7176            |&lt;br /&gt;|  Somerville MA 02143               |  inter : planet4589 at gmail       |&lt;br /&gt;|  USA                               |          jcm@cfa.harvard.edu       |&lt;br /&gt;|                                                                         |&lt;br /&gt;| JSR: http://www.planet4589.org/jsr.html                                 |&lt;br /&gt;| Back issues:  http://www.planet4589.org/space/jsr/back                  |&lt;br /&gt;| Subscribe/unsub: http://www.planet4589.org/mailman/listinfo/jsr         |&lt;br /&gt;'-------------------------------------------------------------------------'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:51:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41402</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41401) Interesting. But can it really succeed?</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41401</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Interesting. But can it really succeed?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. DARPA plans to make space trash into treasure&lt;br /&gt;By Molly Bernhart Walker         Comment |  Forward | Twitter | Facebook |&lt;br /&gt;LinkedIn&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency hopes to reduce the cost and&lt;br /&gt;shorten the deployment-time of defense communication systems with a new plan to&lt;br /&gt;repurpose the valuable components in retired, non-operating satellites. And&lt;br /&gt;according to a broad agency announcement posted to FedBizOpps.gov Dec. 22,&lt;br /&gt;DARPA plans to spend approximately $36 million in contracting dollars in order&lt;br /&gt;to do so.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;satlets,' that will latch onto the antenna of retired satellites, essentially&lt;br /&gt;creating a new space system. In order to deliver satlets to orbit economically,&lt;br /&gt;DARPA says they would travel in payload orbital delivery system, or PODS, that&lt;br /&gt;can &amp;quot;ride along&amp;quot; on a commercial satellite launch.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The tender plans to be equipped with grasping mechanical arms for removing the&lt;br /&gt;Satlets and components from the PODS using unique robotic tools to be developed&lt;br /&gt;in the program,&amp;quot; says DARPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the presolicitation, space is a rich salvage yard: &amp;quot;With over&lt;br /&gt;1,300 satellites launched to [geosynchronous orbit] since the 1960's, it&lt;br /&gt;estimated over $300B worth of hardware and approximately 20,000 kg of apertures&lt;br /&gt;are in the GEO belt today.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Development will culminate with an on-orbit demonstration of at least one&lt;br /&gt;successful aperture repurposing by 2015 or 2016, says DARPA. Responses to the&lt;br /&gt;announcement are due to DARPA by Feb. 6 at 4:00 pm EST.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For more:&lt;br /&gt;- see the solicitation on FBO&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Related Articles:&lt;br /&gt;NASA unprepared to deal with mounting orbital debris&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:21:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41401</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41400) Space Weather News for Jan. 5, 2012</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41400</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Jan. 5, 2012&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;MARS PROBE PHOTOGRAPHED: Phobos-Grunt, a Russian Mars probe stuck in Earth&lt;br /&gt;orbit since November, is sinking back into the atmosphere.  Best estimates&lt;br /&gt;suggest re-entry will occur on Jan. 15th or 16th. Meanwhile, citizen scientists&lt;br /&gt;can see the probe moving through the night sky sometimes shining as brightly as&lt;br /&gt;a first-magnitude star.   French astrophotographer Thierry Legault recently&lt;br /&gt;photographed Phobos-Grunt through a 14-inch telescope, revealing its outlines&lt;br /&gt;and perhaps a clue as to why the probe has had difficulty communicating with&lt;br /&gt;Earth.  His images and video are highlighted on today's edition of&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Local flyby times for Phobos-Grunt may be found using SpaceWeather's online&lt;br /&gt;satellite tracker (http://spaceweather.com/flybys) or on your smartphone:&lt;br /&gt;http://simpleflybys.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:02:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41400</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41399) Space Weather News for Jan. 3, 2012</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41399</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Jan. 3, 2012&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FIRST METEOR SHOWER OF 2012: The annual Quadrantid meteor shower peaks on&lt;br /&gt;Wednesday morning, Jan. 4th, when Earth passes through a narrow stream of&lt;br /&gt;debris from a comet thought to have broken apart some 500 years ago.  The&lt;br /&gt;shower is expected to be strong (as many as 100 meteors per hour), but elusive,&lt;br /&gt;with a peak that lasts no longer than a couple of hours.  The shower's radiant&lt;br /&gt;near Polaris favors observers in the northern hemisphere.  Images, live audio&lt;br /&gt;from a meteor radar, and more information are available on today's edition of&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:06:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41399</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41398) NASA Science News for Dec. 30, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41398</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Dec. 30, 2011&lt;br /&gt;The discovery of a towering mountain on Vesta could solve a longstanding&lt;br /&gt;mystery: How did so many pieces of the giant asteroid end up right here on our&lt;br /&gt;own planet?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/30dec_s&lt;br /&gt;pacemountain/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NASA Science News for Dec. 30, 2011&lt;br /&gt;NASA's twin GRAIL spacecraft, on a mission to map the Moon's gravitational&lt;br /&gt;field, are nearing their New Year's Eve and New Year's Day main-engine burns to&lt;br /&gt;place the duo in lunar orbit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/30dec_g&lt;br /&gt;rail/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:32:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41398</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41397) NASA Science News for Dec. 23, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41397</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Dec. 23, 2011&lt;br /&gt;On Dec. 26th, Venus and the crescent Moon will gather together for a beautiful&lt;br /&gt;night-after-Christmas sky show.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/23dec_n&lt;br /&gt;ightafter/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Space Weather News for Dec. 23, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Astronauts onboard the International Space Station have seen sungrazing Comet&lt;br /&gt;Lovejoy from Earth orbit.  ISS commander Dan Burbank describes the comet's&lt;br /&gt;green-glowing tail as &amp;quot;the most amazing thing I have ever seen in space.&amp;quot; Video&lt;br /&gt;from the ISS and updated images from Earth are highlighted on today's edition&lt;br /&gt;of Spaceweather.com.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:02:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41397</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MoonToad/41395) Right, that was the post I was refering to, but the original pos...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41395</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Right, that was the post I was refering to, but the original poster took it&lt;br /&gt;down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:05:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41395</guid>
      <author>MoonToad@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41394) Ask any theologians and they'll tell you! [LAUGHS]</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41394</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Ask any theologians and they'll tell you! [LAUGHS]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:37:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41394</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41392) NASA Science News for Dec. 20, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41392</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Dec. 20, 2011&lt;br /&gt;NASA's Kepler spacecraft has found two Earth-sized planets orbiting a distant&lt;br /&gt;sun-like star. These alien worlds are intermingled in their star system with&lt;br /&gt;other much larger planets, an arrangement which challenges orthodox ideas of&lt;br /&gt;how planets are formed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/20dec_e&lt;br /&gt;arthsized/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And we need to once again rethink how solar systems form.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:12:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41392</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41391) Space Weather News for Dec. 20, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41391</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Dec. 20, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SUNRISE COMET: Comet Lovejoy is receding from the sun, remarkably still intact&lt;br /&gt;after its Dec. 16th plunge through the solar atmosphere. Multiple observers in&lt;br /&gt;the southern hemisphere are now reporting that they can see and photograph the&lt;br /&gt;comet's tail shining through the twilight of sunrise.  Pictures of this rare&lt;br /&gt;apparition are highlighted on today's edition of http://spaceweather.com.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:01:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41391</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41390) It's a matter of priorities: Compare with the various countries ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41390</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;It's a matter of priorities: Compare with the various countries that have too&lt;br /&gt;many debts as a result of too many deficits withou surpluses, such as Greece&lt;br /&gt;and Italy and Britain; their governments cut spending (at the wrong time?);&lt;br /&gt;what to cut back and what to leave as is?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 03:06:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41390</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Xenos/41389) American businesses.  That's why America is in so much doogy doo...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41389</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;American businesses.  That's why America is in so much doogy doo.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:48:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41389</guid>
      <author>Xenos@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Cyanide/41388) Xenos&gt; Actually you are wrong. Businesses cut back on R&amp;D, and i...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41388</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Xenos&amp;gt; Actually you are wrong. Businesses cut back on R&amp;amp;D, and increase&lt;br /&gt;advertising for their current products. :) ,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 18:33:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41388</guid>
      <author>Cyanide@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Xenos/41387) Especially since science is an area where you have established s...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41387</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Especially since science is an area where you have established scientists&lt;br /&gt;training/teaching new scientists (i.e. research professors lecturing new&lt;br /&gt;students).  So if you cut back on, let's say, university funding and grants,&lt;br /&gt;you will likely reduce the number of older scientists available to teach/train&lt;br /&gt;younger ones, AND reduce the number of student places.  And you may say, &amp;quot;so&lt;br /&gt;what?&amp;quot;.  But be assured that other countries, particularly China and Japan, are&lt;br /&gt;doing the exact oposite.  So the net result is that your country becomes&lt;br /&gt;increasing reliant on foreign technology, which isn't a good position to be in&lt;br /&gt;in the long term.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 05:52:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41387</guid>
      <author>Xenos@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Odd/41386) QUITTNER&gt;  yeah, timing is important.  And laying off people in ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41386</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;QUITTNER&amp;gt;  yeah, timing is important.  And laying off people in one industry&lt;br /&gt;(science) just before a crisis is just as bad as when it happens in another&lt;br /&gt;industry (e.g. cars).  In which case the government likes to spend MORE to save&lt;br /&gt;the industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rather shortsighted to think you can just cut funding to science for a couple&lt;br /&gt;of years, and pick it back up later without consequences.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:15:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41386</guid>
      <author>Odd@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41385) Space Weather News for Dec. 16, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41385</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Dec. 16, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SUNGRAZING COMET SURVIVES: Sungrazing Comet Lovejoy has confounded the experts&lt;br /&gt;and survived its close encounter with the sun.  Last night, NASA's Solar&lt;br /&gt;Dynamics Observatory recorded amazing movies of the comet entering and exiting&lt;br /&gt;the sun's atmosphere. Comet Lovejoy's scorched remnant is now receding from the&lt;br /&gt;sun in full view of the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory.  Visit&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com for the latest movies and discussion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NASA Science News for Dec. 16, 2011&lt;br /&gt;Sungrazing Comet Lovejoy has shocked astronomers by surviving its &amp;quot;death&lt;br /&gt;plunge&amp;quot; into the sun. Must-see movies of the comet's passage through the sun's&lt;br /&gt;atmosphere are featured in today's story from Science@NASA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/16dec_c&lt;br /&gt;ometlovejoy/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:58:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41385</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Xenos/41383) Pecc is right - you can't move forward if you don't conduct rese...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41383</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Pecc is right - you can't move forward if you don't conduct research.  All&lt;br /&gt;(successful) businesses in the technology industries will cut back everything&lt;br /&gt;and anything before they cut back on research.  You don't know what you don't&lt;br /&gt;know.  A million techological inisights might arise from some piece of blue-sky&lt;br /&gt;research.  We wouldn't have the internet if not for CERN (the European&lt;br /&gt;Organization for Nuclear Research), for example.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:58:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41383</guid>
      <author>Xenos@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Peccavimus/41382) It's called investing in the future.  In hard times, you invest ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41382</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;It's called investing in the future.  In hard times, you invest more, not less.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Your argument would be stronger if you didn't say things like &amp;quot;deficit after&lt;br /&gt;deficit keeps the debts going up,&amp;quot; which is essentially meaningless.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:52:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41382</guid>
      <author>Peccavimus@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41381) Proper timing is important. At a time when deficit after deficit...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41381</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Proper timing is important. At a time when deficit after deficit keeps the&lt;br /&gt;debts going up and up scientific research can wait for better times until&lt;br /&gt;surpluses are replacing deficits - hopefully soon?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:50:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41381</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41380) http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/15/world/europe/boris-chertok-rus...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41380</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/15/world/europe/boris-chertok-russian-rocket-eng&lt;br /&gt;ineer-dies-at-99.html?src=recg&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boris Chertok, Engineer With Russian Space Program, Dies at 99&lt;br /&gt;By DENNIS HEVESI&lt;br /&gt;Published: December 15, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boris Chertok, a Russian rocket engineer who played a central role in designing&lt;br /&gt;the navigation systems for Soviet spacecraft during the race to the moon, among&lt;br /&gt;them the one that carried the first human into space, died Wednesday in Moscow.&lt;br /&gt;He was 99.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Natalia Kolesnikova/Agence France-Presse -- Getty Images&lt;br /&gt;Boris Chertok's navigation systems guided spacecraft.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Russia's state-controlled spacecraft manufacturer, RKK Energiya, for which Mr.&lt;br /&gt;Chertok was a consultant in his later years, said the cause was pneumonia.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For more than 20 years, Mr. Chertok was a deputy to Sergei Pavlovich Korolev,&lt;br /&gt;known as the father of the Soviet space program. Under Mr. Korolev, who died in&lt;br /&gt;1966, Mr. Chertok was the primary designer of control systems for one of the&lt;br /&gt;world's first intercontinental ballistic missiles, the R-7, and the Soviet&lt;br /&gt;Union's earliest manned spacecraft, the Vostok, the Voskhod and the Soyuz.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It's difficult to think of any major event in the Soviet space program that he&lt;br /&gt;didn't contribute to,&amp;quot; said Asif Siddiqi, a history professor at Fordham&lt;br /&gt;University and the chief translator of Mr. Chertok's four-volume memoir,&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Rockets and People,&amp;quot; published between 2004 and this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Soviet Union seemed predominant in the early years of the space race. Mr.&lt;br /&gt;Chertok's systems guided the rocket that bore Sputnik 1, the first artificial&lt;br /&gt;satellite to orbit Earth, into space on Oct. 4, 1957; and, on April 12, 1961,&lt;br /&gt;the rocket that took the first man into space, Yuri Gagarin. (Less than a month&lt;br /&gt;later, Alan B. Shepard Jr. became the first American in space.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Soviets embellished their earlier feats. In August 1962, they launched two&lt;br /&gt;manned space capsules that would orbit at the same time. On June 16, 1963, they&lt;br /&gt;sent the first woman into space, Valentina Tereshkova. In October 1964, three&lt;br /&gt;cosmonauts orbited Earth; it was the first space mission with a multiperson&lt;br /&gt;crew, five months before a two-man American flight.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By 1969, however, the United States stepped up to the challenge issued by&lt;br /&gt;President John F. Kennedy on May 25, 1961, to send an American to the moon by&lt;br /&gt;the end of the decade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Neil Armstrong stepped onto the lunar surface on July 20, 1969, an&lt;br /&gt;unmanned robot probe that Mr. Chertok and his colleagues had launched a week&lt;br /&gt;earlier was stuck in orbit around the moon, stalled by a technical problem. It&lt;br /&gt;later crashed into the surface.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In his memoir, Mr. Chertok called the American moon landing a &amp;quot;personal defeat&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;for his country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boris Yevseyevich Chertok was born in Lodz, now part of Poland, on March 1,&lt;br /&gt;1912, the son of an accountant. The family later moved to Moscow. Information&lt;br /&gt;about his survivors was not available.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Chertok was an electrician at 17, and by 1930 was working in an aircraft&lt;br /&gt;factory. He graduated from the Moscow Energy Institute in 1940. After World War&lt;br /&gt;II, he was a member of a team of experts sent to Germany to mine records of the&lt;br /&gt;German rocketry program. Another member of that team was Mr. Korolev. They&lt;br /&gt;brought back the blueprints of the German V-2, which became the basis for the&lt;br /&gt;Soviet missile and space programs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Chertok longed to go into space.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In 2001, a Soyuz-U booster blasted two Russian astronauts and an American&lt;br /&gt;millionaire, Dennis A. Tito, into orbit for a rendezvous with the International&lt;br /&gt;Space Station. Mr. Tito paid $20 million for the trip.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interviewed at Russia's mission control center at the time, Mr. Chertok said,&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I am a little bit under 90, and if someone presented me with $20 million I&lt;br /&gt;would gladly spend it on a ticket to space.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:07:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41380</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41379) There'a Neil De Grasse video somewhere on YouTube I'm too lazy t...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41379</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There'a Neil De Grasse video somewhere on YouTube I'm too lazy to find&lt;br /&gt;right now, but Einstein wasn't planning on bar code scanners when&lt;br /&gt;working on the photoelectric effect.  He was working on science, and&lt;br /&gt;the stuff we can do with lasers came later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As someone who is more of an engineer than a scientist, I say, &amp;quot;let&lt;br /&gt;the scientists do science.&amp;quot;  If there's something in the world they&lt;br /&gt;don't understand, let them go off and figure it out.  It'll be the&lt;br /&gt;engineers' jobs to make something useful out of it for people later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:46:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41379</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Peccavimus/41378) The results will be that human beings will have a deeper underst...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41378</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;The results will be that human beings will have a deeper understanding of the&lt;br /&gt;nature of universe than they have ever had before.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think that's worth a few million, at the very least.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:38:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41378</guid>
      <author>Peccavimus@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(The After Party/41377) QUITTNER: DOWN WITH SCIENCE!</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41377</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  QUITTNER: DOWN WITH SCIENCE!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:57:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41377</guid>
      <author>The After Party@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(The Great Godzilla/41376) With that view, it's a damn shame that we went to all the extrem...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41376</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;With that view, it's a damn shame that we went to all the extreme expense to&lt;br /&gt;put a man on the moon. When we started the Apollo program, we didn't know what&lt;br /&gt;we'd get out of it (other than beating the Soviets to it).&lt;br /&gt;Of course, the innovations that came out of the space program include&lt;br /&gt;technology that we take for granted today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:23:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41376</guid>
      <author>The Great Godzilla@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41375) I hope that the RESULTS will be worth all the money that was spe...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41375</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;I hope that the RESULTS will be worth all the money that was spent, is&lt;br /&gt;continuing to be spent. Maybe it reduces the unemployment of affected personel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:53:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41375</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(DesCartes/41374) Apparently, Lederman wanted to name his book "The Goddamn Partic...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41374</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Apparently, Lederman wanted to name his book &amp;quot;The Goddamn Particle&amp;quot; because it&lt;br /&gt;was so hard to find. He doesn't like that term.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:28:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41374</guid>
      <author>DesCartes@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41373) I wish people would stop calling the Higgs the God Particle. Tha...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41373</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;I wish people would stop calling the Higgs the God Particle. That's just&lt;br /&gt;stupid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:34:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41373</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41372) http://www2.electronicproducts.com/5_Things_to_Know_Higgs_Boson_...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41372</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www2.electronicproducts.com/5_Things_to_Know_Higgs_Boson_and_the_LHC-art&lt;br /&gt;icle-fajb_higgs_LHC_dec2011-html.aspx&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This article was posted on 12/14/2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5 Things to Know: Higgs Boson and the LHC&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Researchers at the Large Hadron Collider believe they may have identified the&lt;br /&gt;elusive &amp;quot;God particle&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BY JEFFREY BAUSCH&lt;br /&gt;Researchers at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) believe they've identified the&lt;br /&gt;Higgs boson, the most sought after prize in particle physics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Large Hadron Collider in Geneva. (Credit: boston.com)&lt;br /&gt;If you're unfamiliar with the Higgs boson and LHC, here are five things to know&lt;br /&gt;to help you follow this developing story:&lt;br /&gt;1. The Standard Model and the Higgs boson&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Standard Model is, essentially, an instructional booklet that describes how&lt;br /&gt;subatomic particles and forces interact. It's made up of 16 particles total: 12&lt;br /&gt;matter particles and four force-carrier particles.&lt;br /&gt;It's worked fairly well in the world of physics so far, but there are some&lt;br /&gt;issues that researchers need to resolve in order to attain a more complete&lt;br /&gt;understanding of the Universe. For one, the Standard Model cannot explain one&lt;br /&gt;of the most fundamental forces out there -- gravity. Also, it describes only&lt;br /&gt;ordinary matter which, in the big picture of things, makes up just a small&lt;br /&gt;portion of the total Universe (dark matter is much more dominant). Then,&lt;br /&gt;there's the Higgs boson issue.&lt;br /&gt;The Higgs boson, or &amp;quot;God particle,&amp;quot; is based upon a theory first proposed in&lt;br /&gt;1964 by physicists Peter Higgs, Francois Englert, and Robert Brout. In it, they&lt;br /&gt;stated that particles acquire mass through their interactions with an&lt;br /&gt;all-pervading field, called the Higgs field, and are carried by the Higgs&lt;br /&gt;boson. In other words, the Higgs boson is responsible for everything in the&lt;br /&gt;Universe obtaining mass. Identifying it is important to the Standard Model&lt;br /&gt;because it would explain why other elementary particles (except photon and&lt;br /&gt;gluon) have mass. Particle masses, and the differences between electromagnetism&lt;br /&gt;and weak force, are significant to many aspects of the structure of&lt;br /&gt;microscopic, and thus macroscopic, matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. The LHC -- in a nutshell&lt;br /&gt;The LHC was built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research in order to&lt;br /&gt;test high-energy physics theories like the Higgs boson. It took more than 15&lt;br /&gt;years to build, with over 10,000 scientists from 40+ countries contributing to&lt;br /&gt;the effort.&lt;br /&gt;It is, essentially, a &amp;quot;Big Bang Machine.&amp;quot; The LHC is a Super Proton Synchrotron&lt;br /&gt;built in a tunnel roughly 12.5 feet in diameter that stretches 17 miles in&lt;br /&gt;circumference. It lies several hundred feet below the France-Switzerland border&lt;br /&gt;near Geneva, Switzerland.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Large Hadron Collider underground beam line. (Credit: physicsworld.com)&lt;br /&gt;The LHC collides two counter rotating beams of subatomic particles (protons) or&lt;br /&gt;lead ions at 99.9999999% the speed of light, in conditions colder than the&lt;br /&gt;space between the stars. By crashing them together, researchers are able to&lt;br /&gt;study the subsequent release of unstable, high-energy particles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An example of proton-proton collision. (Credit: nsf.gov)&lt;br /&gt;3. Record speeds&lt;br /&gt;The proton beams move around the LHC ring inside continuous vacuum chambers. In&lt;br /&gt;order to get them traveling fast enough, scientists and engineers generate a&lt;br /&gt;powerful magnetic field using 1,740 superconducting magnetics, which needed&lt;br /&gt;approximately 40,000 leak-tight welds and 65,000 splices of specially designed&lt;br /&gt;superconducting cables.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In order to avoid excessive resistive losses, the magnets are kept at just a&lt;br /&gt;few degrees above absolute zero. This is achieved using an enormous, incredibly&lt;br /&gt;intricate cryogenics system: eight above-ground refrigeration plants which,&lt;br /&gt;altogether, pump approximately 400,000 liters of liquid helium a year.&lt;br /&gt;4. Enormous detectors&lt;br /&gt;The LHC proton beams can be stored at high energy for 10 to 20 hours. Over the&lt;br /&gt;course of 10 hours, they'll make four hundred million revolutions, with&lt;br /&gt;collisions taking place inside LHC experiment zones, or detectors. These&lt;br /&gt;detectors are capable of pinpointing a particle with an accuracy of 15 microns;&lt;br /&gt;that's 20 times thinner than a piece of your hair.&lt;br /&gt;There are six detectors total. They're all housed in strategically located,&lt;br /&gt;underground caverns. Two -- the ATLAS experiment and Compact Muon Solenoid&lt;br /&gt;(CMS) -- are large, general purpose detectors, while A Large Ion Collider&lt;br /&gt;Experiment (ALICE) and LHCb have more specific roles. The other two, TOTEM and&lt;br /&gt;LHCf, are smaller and set up for very specific research.&lt;br /&gt;A summary and pictures of the four main detectors:&lt;br /&gt;b&amp;quot; ATLAS&lt;br /&gt;Looks for signs of new physics, including origins of mass and extra dimensions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. (Credit: lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/)&lt;br /&gt;b&amp;quot; CMS&lt;br /&gt;Hunts for the Higgs boson and look for clues to the nature of dark matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CMS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. (Credit: lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/)&lt;br /&gt;b&amp;quot; ALICE&lt;br /&gt;Studies a &amp;quot;fluid&amp;quot; form of matter called quark-gluon plasma that existed shortly&lt;br /&gt;after the Big Bang.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ALICE detector at the Large Hadron Collider. (Credit: lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/)&lt;br /&gt;b&amp;quot; LHCb&lt;br /&gt;Equal amounts of matter and antimatter were created in the Big Bang the LHCb&lt;br /&gt;investigates what happened to the &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; antimatter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LHCb detector at the Large Hadron Collider. (Credit: lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/)&lt;br /&gt;5. Putting it all together&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Due to their enormity, detectors were assembled in bits. ATLAS was lowered in&lt;br /&gt;pieces over several years, and assembled almost entirely underground. When its&lt;br /&gt;largest part -- the barrel toroid magnet -- had to be brought down a shaft, it&lt;br /&gt;had just 10 cm of clearance. And that's just the heavy lifting! There was also&lt;br /&gt;all of the fine engineering work that needed to be done in order to actually&lt;br /&gt;assemble these detectors. Layers of electronic sensors were wired and connected&lt;br /&gt;by hand, with up to 300 people a day working in the cave up against one&lt;br /&gt;another.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, the CMS was assembled mostly above ground in units, including the&lt;br /&gt;world's largest-ever electromagnet. It took 10 hours to be lowered down a&lt;br /&gt;330-foot shaft, with a clearance of just 20 cm on either side. Adding to the&lt;br /&gt;stress of this endeavor was the fact that its cylindrically arranged silicon&lt;br /&gt;wafer detectors contain a vast network of micro-circuitry including 73,000&lt;br /&gt;radiation-hard, low-noise microelectronic chips, 40,000 analog optical links,&lt;br /&gt;and 1,000 power supply units. One wrong move and the detector could suffer some&lt;br /&gt;fairly severe damage.&lt;br /&gt;So what did the LHC researchers see?&lt;br /&gt;At a seminar yesterday, the heads of ATLAS and CMS said that they saw &amp;quot;spikes&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;in their data at roughly the same mass: 124-125 gigaelectronvolts (GeV). Guido&lt;br /&gt;Tonelli, spokesperson for the CMS detector, summarized the state of the&lt;br /&gt;experiment: &amp;quot;The excess is most compatible with a Standard Model Higgs in the&lt;br /&gt;vicinity of 124 GeV and below, but the statistical significance is not large&lt;br /&gt;enough to say anything conclusive.&lt;br /&gt;As of today, what we see is consistent either with a background fluctuation or&lt;br /&gt;with the presence of the boson.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further complicating the validity of this story is that these stats come from&lt;br /&gt;just a few events among the billions of particle collisions that get analyzed&lt;br /&gt;at the LHC. The team will need many more events to occur in order to lend some&lt;br /&gt;credence to this claim.&lt;br /&gt;Regardless though, the possibility that the Higgs boson might have been&lt;br /&gt;discovered has generated a ton of excitement in the world of science and&lt;br /&gt;engineering. b&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;References for this story:&lt;br /&gt;1. bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16158374&lt;br /&gt;2. lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:58:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41372</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41371) NASA Science News for Dec. 9, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41371</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Dec. 9, 2011&lt;br /&gt;NASA's Dawn probe, now orbiting Vesta in the asteroid belt, has found some&lt;br /&gt;surprising things on the giant asteroid--things that have prompted one&lt;br /&gt;researcher to declare Vesta &amp;quot;the smallest terrestrial planet.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/09dec_v&lt;br /&gt;estaplanet/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A video version of this story is available at&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JBNkts5YXA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:54:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41371</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41370) It's harder to see smaller things than bigger things, so we will...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41370</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's harder to see smaller things than bigger things, so we will find&lt;br /&gt;the planets that a 2.4x the size of Earth before we find the ones that&lt;br /&gt;are within 20% or so of Earth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To be more Bayesian, I'd want to know when we _expected_ to find a&lt;br /&gt;planet of this size if we assumed that Earth like planets were common&lt;br /&gt;(for whatever definition of &amp;quot;common&amp;quot; you want).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:24:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41370</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Cyanide/41369) You need to watch Brad Meltzer's Decoded on the history channel ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41369</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;You need to watch Brad Meltzer's Decoded on the history channel about UFOs :)&lt;br /&gt;If you combine that with some string theory, the planet is much bigger. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:56:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41369</guid>
      <author>Cyanide@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Steppenwolf/41368) I threw out that mini-definition not because it purports to be a...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41368</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;I threw out that mini-definition not because it purports to be a definition for&lt;br /&gt;all life, but simply because those are extremely interesting in their&lt;br /&gt;complexity, particularly in the way that selection pressures cause them to&lt;br /&gt;change and adapt once self-replication is achieved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So neener. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Likewise, I suspect that our &amp;quot;search for life&amp;quot; is similarly humorous to&lt;br /&gt;larger,&lt;br /&gt;much more intelligent forms of life that probably exist around us or even&lt;br /&gt;amongst us, but we are too stupid and blind to even realize it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can see how this _could_ be the case, but I have no reason to believe that&lt;br /&gt;this IS the case. Whence comes your statement that this is probable?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I do think that searching for &amp;quot;life&amp;quot; is fun and cool , if for no other reason&lt;br /&gt;than to put yet another bullet into the whole &amp;quot;god created us, we are special,&lt;br /&gt;we are unique&amp;quot; ridiculousness.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yeah, I didn't want to come out and say it directly, but that too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:32:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41368</guid>
      <author>Steppenwolf@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(The After Party/41367) JL</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41367</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;JL&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  Ah, &amp;quot;dark life&amp;quot;. heh&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:10:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41367</guid>
      <author>The After Party@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(JL/41366) "naturally arising self-replicating complex structures"</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41366</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&amp;quot;naturally arising self-replicating complex structures&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hmm, far too vague to define &amp;quot;life&amp;quot;, IMO :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I do think that searching for &amp;quot;life&amp;quot; is fun and cool , if for no other reason&lt;br /&gt;than to put yet another bullet into the whole &amp;quot;god created us, we are special,&lt;br /&gt;we are unique&amp;quot; ridiculousness.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm always intrigured by the idea of the worm, in his simple and non-complex&lt;br /&gt;world. If he were to search for life around him on a street crowded with&lt;br /&gt;people, he would probably conclude that no other intelligent life exists.&lt;br /&gt;Because his perspective prohibits him from seeing the giant humans around him&lt;br /&gt;with the complex motion, and his lack of intelligence prevents him from even&lt;br /&gt;recognizing such a vastly superior intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Likewise, I suspect that our &amp;quot;search for life&amp;quot; is similarly humorous to larger,&lt;br /&gt;much more intelligent forms of life that probably exist around us or even&lt;br /&gt;amongst us, but we are too stupid and blind to even realize it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:59:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41366</guid>
      <author>JL@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Steppenwolf/41365) Thanks for the math, Vanity. I wonder, though, if a super-earth ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41365</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Thanks for the math, Vanity. I wonder, though, if a super-earth wouldn't in&lt;br /&gt;fact be denser as well, due to further compression.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:47:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41365</guid>
      <author>Steppenwolf@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Vanity/41364) A planet 2.4. times the mass of Earth would, if it had the same ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41364</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;   A planet 2.4. times the mass of Earth would, if it had the same density of&lt;br /&gt;Earth, have only 1.34 times the surface gravity of Earth. This is because while&lt;br /&gt;gravity goes up with mass, it also falls off with distance from the center of&lt;br /&gt;gravity, so that a larger super-earth with 2.4 times Earth mass would have&lt;br /&gt;substantially less than 2.4. times Earth gravity.  (By contrast, an Earth-mass&lt;br /&gt;planet which was denser and had a smaller radius, would have a higher surface&lt;br /&gt;gravity than Earth.)&lt;br /&gt;   1.34 Earth gravity would be something that human beings could easily adjust&lt;br /&gt;to by growing additional muscle fibers. You pull more Gs than that just turning&lt;br /&gt;the corner in a car.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:42:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41364</guid>
      <author>Vanity@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Steppenwolf/41363) Well, there are two worthy scientific goals:</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41363</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Well, there are two worthy scientific goals:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1) Answer the question, &amp;quot;How likely is our existence--that is, intelligent&lt;br /&gt;life?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2) Find other intelligences to chat with.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We can learn a whole lot about ourselves by finding life--or, if you prefer,&lt;br /&gt;naturally arising self-replicating complex structures--on other planets.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:45:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41363</guid>
      <author>Steppenwolf@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(JL/41362) Personally, I think we're a bit too focused on looking for life ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41362</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Personally, I think we're a bit too focused on looking for life that looks like&lt;br /&gt;us. Hell, we don't even have a good definition of &amp;quot;life&amp;quot;. What exactly are we&lt;br /&gt;looking for?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To me, the universe is alive. Everything is life, on a big sliding scale. To&lt;br /&gt;segment it off at an arbitrary point and define life as something that is&lt;br /&gt;chemically like what we have on this planet, that just seems so narrow-minded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I suppose you have to look for something.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:28:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41362</guid>
      <author>JL@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Steppenwolf/41361) While there's some of that, I think it's fair to say that it's m...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41361</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;While there's some of that, I think it's fair to say that it's more likely that&lt;br /&gt;life has arisen on planets like ours, where we know it's possible, than on&lt;br /&gt;planets utterly unlike ours, where we have no reason to think it's possible.&lt;br /&gt;Where would you go to look for life first, places like the Earth or places like&lt;br /&gt;Mercury? You only have limited resources, after all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:07:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41361</guid>
      <author>Steppenwolf@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(JL/41360) We're so vain, to think that we understand life well enough to a...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41360</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;We're so vain, to think that we understand life well enough to assume it must&lt;br /&gt;be chemically similar to us, and that our world is a 'model' for where we'll&lt;br /&gt;find life elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41360</guid>
      <author>JL@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Steppenwolf/41359) IIRC, even this planet seems to have a mass of 2.4x Earth's, whi...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41359</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;IIRC, even this planet seems to have a mass of 2.4x Earth's, which is quite a&lt;br /&gt;lot... but I can't imagine that would stop at least primitive forms of life.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 04:29:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41359</guid>
      <author>Steppenwolf@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Vanity/41358) Not the first planet in the 'habitable zone', but the first in t...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41358</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;   Not the first planet in the 'habitable zone', but the first in the habitable&lt;br /&gt;zone whose size is approximately that of Earth.&lt;br /&gt;   Of course, being in the 'habitable zone' isn't a guarantee of being&lt;br /&gt;habitable.  The Moon has the same orbital distance from the Sun as the Earth,&lt;br /&gt;but is completely hostile to life.&lt;br /&gt;   Gliese 581 g is in its star's habitable zone, but has a mass 3-4 times that&lt;br /&gt;of Earth. It was discovered in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:55:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41358</guid>
      <author>Vanity@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41357) NASA Science News for Dec. 5, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41357</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Dec. 5, 2011&lt;br /&gt;In a significant milestone on the road to finding Earth's &amp;quot;twin&amp;quot; elsewhere in&lt;br /&gt;the galaxy, NASA's Kepler mission has confirmed its first planet in the&lt;br /&gt;habitable zone of a distant sun-like star.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/05dec_f&lt;br /&gt;irstplanet/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41357</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Vanity/41356) Classifications like "planet" and "asteroid" are purely arbitrar...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41356</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;   Classifications like &amp;quot;planet&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;asteroid&amp;quot; are purely arbitrary.  There is&lt;br /&gt;no hard and fast limit at which something stops being a planet and starts being&lt;br /&gt;an asteroid.  &amp;quot;Dwarf planet&amp;quot; merely muddles up the boundary between the two&lt;br /&gt;arbitrary classifications further.  The current criteria are&lt;br /&gt;self-contradictory, and by bringing in dynamic criteria would make an identical&lt;br /&gt;object be either a &amp;quot;planet&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;dwarf planet&amp;quot; depending on where it was in&lt;br /&gt;the solar system.  (For instance, if the Earth, or any Earth-sized object, were&lt;br /&gt;found out at the distance of Sedna, it would be a &amp;quot;dwarf planet&amp;quot;). The stuff&lt;br /&gt;about 'clearing the orbit' is gobbledygook; they are not looking at whether the&lt;br /&gt;orbit is actually 'cleared' (hint: no orbit is 'cleared', every orbit is&lt;br /&gt;crossed by millions of small objects) but at the distance from the Sun. The&lt;br /&gt;definition is reverse-engineered from the requirement that there be only eight&lt;br /&gt;planets; in other words, it begs the question.&lt;br /&gt;   &amp;quot;Hydrostatic equilibrium&amp;quot; is another illusion. There is no exact limit at&lt;br /&gt;which objects start being in equilibrium; and the shape of an object is&lt;br /&gt;governed by lots of things other than size or mass: icy objects tend to relax&lt;br /&gt;more easily than rocky objects, and objects under tidal strain (e.g., those&lt;br /&gt;orbiting close to a larger planet) flex, liquefy, and relax into a equilibrant&lt;br /&gt;shape, while larger and more massive objects may remain irregular. And an&lt;br /&gt;object that started out with an equilibrant shape can be damaged by impacts and&lt;br /&gt;become irregular.&lt;br /&gt;   In other words, the present 'planetary' criteria are no more scientific than&lt;br /&gt;the old ones.  I don't much care whether people talk about 8 or 9 or 10 planets&lt;br /&gt;-- it's arbitrary -- but I hate hearing people say things like 'scientists&lt;br /&gt;proved Pluto wasn't a planet'.  Nothing was proved; the classification was&lt;br /&gt;simply changed so that Pluto no longer fit.  Pluto didn't cross the border; the&lt;br /&gt;border crossed Pluto.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:23:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41356</guid>
      <author>Vanity@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41355) It's always been a planet. But is no longer counted as one of th...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41355</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;It's always been a planet. But is no longer counted as one of the major&lt;br /&gt;planets. It's now classified as a dwarf planet. It's not even the largest dwarf&lt;br /&gt;planet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 04:48:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41355</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Steppenwolf/41354) "dwarf planet."</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41354</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&amp;quot;dwarf planet.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;Which is what it along with a few asteroids were reclassified as.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basically, something with enough gravity to become spherical yet not enough&lt;br /&gt;oomph to clear its orbit of other objects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 04:48:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41354</guid>
      <author>Steppenwolf@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Miser/41353) Pluto is a planet again?</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41353</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Pluto is a planet again?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 04:48:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41353</guid>
      <author>Miser@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41352) NASA Science News for Dec. 3, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41352</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Dec. 3, 2011&lt;br /&gt;NASA's New Horizons mission has reached a special milestone on its way to&lt;br /&gt;reconnoiter the Pluto system, coming closer to the dwarf planet than any other&lt;br /&gt;spacecraft.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/03dec_n&lt;br /&gt;ewhorizons/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 13:35:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41352</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41351) NASA Science News for Nov. 26, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41351</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Nov. 26, 2011&lt;br /&gt;On Saturday morning, Dec. 10th, sky watchers in the western United States and&lt;br /&gt;Canada will witness a total lunar eclipse swollen to super-sized proportions by&lt;br /&gt;the Moon illusion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/02dec_l&lt;br /&gt;unareclipse/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A video version of this story is available at&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKtNgD45OB4&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:26:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41351</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41350) It was in my new National Geographic</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41350</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;It was in my new National Geographic&lt;br /&gt;Probably missed hitting the August issue due to press time constraints&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:47:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41350</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Vanity/41349) That was announced back in July.</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41349</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;   That was announced back in July.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:08:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41349</guid>
      <author>Vanity@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41348) Scientists have discovered a fourth moon orbiting Pluto. Tempora...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41348</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Scientists have discovered a fourth moon orbiting Pluto. Temporarily designated&lt;br /&gt;P4, the moon is only about 8-21 miles in diameter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:13:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41348</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41347) NASA Science News for Nov. 26, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41347</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Nov. 26, 2011&lt;br /&gt;NASA's biggest and most capable Mars rover ever left Earth this morning in a&lt;br /&gt;picture perfect launch from Cape Canaveral. The new rover, named &amp;quot;Curiosity&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;is due to reach the Red Planet in August 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/26nov_m&lt;br /&gt;sllaunch/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To learn more about Curiosity's landing site on Mars, check out the video &amp;quot;The&lt;br /&gt;Strange Attraction of Gale Crater&amp;quot;: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNqeftciRFA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:48:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41347</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41346) Space Weather News for Nov. 26, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41346</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Nov. 26, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CME AND RADIATION STORM: A solar radiation storm is in progress around Earth.&lt;br /&gt;At the moment (the late hours of Nov. 26th), the storm is classified as minor,&lt;br /&gt;which means it has little effect on our planet other than to disturb HF radio&lt;br /&gt;transmissions at high latitudes. Bigger effects, however, could be in the&lt;br /&gt;offing.  The same blast that caused the radiation storm also hurled a CME into&lt;br /&gt;space, and this CME appears set to deliver a blow to Earth's magnetic field on&lt;br /&gt;Nov. 28th.  Geomagnetic storms and auroras are possible when the cloud arrives.&lt;br /&gt;Visit http://spaceweather.com for more information and updates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:46:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41346</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41345) Googling around, it looks as if Pittsburgh Automotive makes seve...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41345</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Googling around, it looks as if Pittsburgh Automotive makes several inexpensive&lt;br /&gt;vacuum pumps that would fit your needs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:53:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41345</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41344) Yes, you could, but I doubt very much it would get down to 0.1 b...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41344</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Yes, you could, but I doubt very much it would get down to 0.1 bar.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:44:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41344</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Cyanide/41343) Can you do a "homemade" vacuum pump.. It could be as simple as t...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41343</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Can you do a &amp;quot;homemade&amp;quot; vacuum pump.. It could be as simple as two jars,&lt;br /&gt;connected via a hose and one filled with water.. Then suck the water out of the&lt;br /&gt;jar to drop the pressure with like a big syringe. You might be able to&lt;br /&gt;stabilize it if you put a weight on the &amp;quot;syringe&amp;quot; to keep a constant pressure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:31:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41343</guid>
      <author>Cyanide@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41342) Something like a bell jar, for doing middle-school science exper...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41342</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Something like a bell jar, for doing middle-school science experiments&lt;br /&gt;on plants in partial vacuums.  I'm trying to see if this is practical&lt;br /&gt;to even consider, or if most of the work would go into maintaining the&lt;br /&gt;low air pressure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 06:10:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41342</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41341) HVAC units are designed for high volume and modest vacuum, which...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41341</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;HVAC units are designed for high volume and modest vacuum, which is not useful&lt;br /&gt;for most science-y experimental situations. But it would be good to know just&lt;br /&gt;what application we are talking about. Are we talking about evacuating a bell&lt;br /&gt;jar or a house?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:27:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41341</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Cyanide/41340) Harbor Freight sells a vacuum pump for AC units for like 20 buck...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41340</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Harbor Freight sells a vacuum pump for AC units for like 20 bucks not sure if&lt;br /&gt;it will work or not though..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:20:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41340</guid>
      <author>Cyanide@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(SledgeHammer/41339) A nice, tight venturi "pump" (injector, eductor, whatever- they ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41339</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;A nice, tight venturi &amp;quot;pump&amp;quot; (injector, eductor, whatever- they go by a dozen&lt;br /&gt;names) will get you ~28&amp;quot;Hg, maybe 29-29.5&amp;quot; if it's running really well. On the&lt;br /&gt;downside, you either need a heck of an air compressor (if using air as the&lt;br /&gt;working fluid) or you'll waste a lot of water (if using water), unless you have&lt;br /&gt;one of those fancy-pants standalone systems which just recirculate the water.&lt;br /&gt;As with any vacuum system, losses will really fuck you over, so good seals are&lt;br /&gt;critical.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Humboldt-Aspirator-Filter-Pump/dp/B0047ENUVG/ref=pd_sbs_i&lt;br /&gt;ndust_3&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or just go to Amazon and look up &amp;quot;faucet aspirator.&amp;quot; Someone sells the right&lt;br /&gt;adaptor on eBay (again, &amp;quot;faucet aspirator&amp;quot; to get that listing).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:23:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41339</guid>
      <author>SledgeHammer@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41338) Most homes have vacuum cleaners but I doubt they get down to 0.1...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41338</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Most homes have vacuum cleaners but I doubt they get down to 0.1 bar. There are&lt;br /&gt;laboratory vacuum pumps that probably get down that far. I have no idea whether&lt;br /&gt;you could find a second-hand unit. How large a chamber do you need evacuated?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:47:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41338</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41337) Is there a good way to generate vacuums at home?  I want to get ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41337</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is there a good way to generate vacuums at home?  I want to get about&lt;br /&gt;1% atmosphere for a science project.  How hard will this be?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:41:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41337</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41336) Probably because it large amounts of it are available for mining...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41336</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Probably because it large amounts of it are available for mining and&lt;br /&gt;processing. Higher content ores (or even near-pure native copper) are not&lt;br /&gt;useful if they are more difficult to find or more expensive to mine and&lt;br /&gt;process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:49:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41336</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41335) Nov 16, 2011 03:41 from Gespalder</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41335</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Nov 16, 2011 03:41 from Gespalder&lt;br /&gt;OK, question&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I saw this: Chalcopyrite is the most important copper ore.&lt;br /&gt;However, it is not the highest % copper when pure being only 34.5%&lt;br /&gt;(Tetrahedrite can be lower as it ranges from 32-45%)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So why is Chalcopyrite deemed so important?&lt;br /&gt;Most every other copper ore has a higher % of copper when pure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:46:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41335</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(JL/41333) It doesn't appear to me to actually be on the surface. It looks ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41333</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;It doesn't appear to me to actually be on the surface. It looks like it was&lt;br /&gt;added later, in post-processing.&lt;br /&gt;The white lines almost appear to be at a certain height, like it's slipping&lt;br /&gt;under parts of the terrain, and over other parts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My official guess is that it's a test from Google, of an algorithm to embed&lt;br /&gt;overlay data on a map at a given altitude, to be obscured by anything higher&lt;br /&gt;than it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:14:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41333</guid>
      <author>JL@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41332) There are people who have put QR codes on roofs specifically for</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41332</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;There are people who have put QR codes on roofs specifically for&lt;br /&gt;Google Maps are the like.  This isn't that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:05:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41332</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(DesCartes/41331) I was thinking it was possibly a test pattern, but I was thinkin...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41331</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;I was thinking it was possibly a test pattern, but I was thinking more in terms&lt;br /&gt;of testing to see if a satellite could pick it up. I hadn't considered the&lt;br /&gt;possibility of a missile target.&lt;br /&gt;It is in the middle of nowhere, which makes the missile target thing likely.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:03:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41331</guid>
      <author>DesCartes@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(The After Party/41330) 40.452727,93.742733</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41330</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;40.452727,93.742733&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  That's a SmartCode, point your smart phone at it and it will take you to&lt;br /&gt;  a URL...probably goatsie...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:02:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41330</guid>
      <author>The After Party@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(SledgeHammer/41329) There was discussion elsewhere that there are similar patterns u...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41329</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;There was discussion elsewhere that there are similar patterns used in the&lt;br /&gt;United States; they are for testing pattern recognition by cruise missiles,&lt;br /&gt;IIRC. It's nice to know the Chinese are working on being able to obliterate the&lt;br /&gt;right neighborhood.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:54:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41329</guid>
      <author>SledgeHammer@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41328) If the cut-off lines were all in a line, I'd say a camera artifa...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41328</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the cut-off lines were all in a line, I'd say a camera artifact.  But&lt;br /&gt;they seem &amp;quot;natural,&amp;quot; in the context of computer photos.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:49:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41328</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(DesCartes/41327) Whatever that is, it's pretty old. You can see silt from the riv...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41327</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Whatever that is, it's pretty old. You can see silt from the riverbeds (they&lt;br /&gt;look like dry beds to me) have washed over it. There are lots of straight lines&lt;br /&gt;which suggest, to me, airplane runways. On the other hand, looking at the&lt;br /&gt;northwest side of it, it loos like it follows the texture of the ground, which&lt;br /&gt;suggests that maybe it's just painted.&lt;br /&gt;The vehicle tracks seem to follow the markings, not cross them. (Occasionally,&lt;br /&gt;they cross, but most of the time, they're alongside the markings.) To the west&lt;br /&gt;of it (if you zoom out a little), you can see similar markings but to a less&lt;br /&gt;extensive scale. These appear to be an airplane runway (it's definitely made up&lt;br /&gt;of thin strips of something--the color's off, though, so it doesn't appear to&lt;br /&gt;be cement, but the color appears off elsewhere, too, as if this were a heat&lt;br /&gt;map, or something.)&lt;br /&gt;To the west of that is something else that has a very similar shape, but is&lt;br /&gt;also over-run by silt, which may just be an older version of that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The abruptness with which the original location ends (it's very much contained&lt;br /&gt;within a rectangle) is odd, but it kind of looks like it may have just been&lt;br /&gt;test construction of one of the things to the left. Or possibly something done&lt;br /&gt;with leftover material, although at the scale, there would have been a lot of&lt;br /&gt;leftovers. If the satellite image is actually a heat map of some sort, it may&lt;br /&gt;just be large swaths of pavement reflecting heat up. That may be for a planned&lt;br /&gt;community (lots of roads) that never got built.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:39:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41327</guid>
      <author>DesCartes@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(DesCartes/41326) If you zoom out one click, on the south end, you see something t...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41326</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;If you zoom out one click, on the south end, you see something that by their&lt;br /&gt;shadows look like those electric towers for supporting high-voltage wires. I'm&lt;br /&gt;guessing this is some sort of power station or something. It's probably not an&lt;br /&gt;athletic field, because if you zoom out, there's nothing in the area. No&lt;br /&gt;population suggests no teams or sports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:26:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41326</guid>
      <author>DesCartes@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Tom Brady/41325) Whoops, wrong coordinates.  40.452727,93.742733 ... that's the o...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41325</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Whoops, wrong coordinates.  40.452727,93.742733 ... that's the odd one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:26:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41325</guid>
      <author>Tom Brady@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41324) Looks like a sports field of some kind to me.</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41324</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Looks like a sports field of some kind to me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:18:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41324</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Tom Brady/41323) Google maps Satellite image for 40.404575, 93.636947</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41323</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Google maps Satellite image for 40.404575, 93.636947&lt;br /&gt;Zoom in... what the heck is that pattern?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 04:26:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41323</guid>
      <author>Tom Brady@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41322) NASA Science News for Nov. 14, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41322</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Nov. 14, 2011&lt;br /&gt;How can a world without air have an ionosphere? Somehow the Moon has done it.&lt;br /&gt;Lunar researchers have been struggling with the mystery for years, and they may&lt;br /&gt;have finally found a solution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/14nov_l&lt;br /&gt;unarionosphere/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A video version of this story is available at&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zSrP4MacFE&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:11:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41322</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gwark/41321) Here (at 57N) the sun doesn't even get to 10 degrees above the h...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41321</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Here (at 57N) the sun doesn't even get to 10 degrees above the horizon on the&lt;br /&gt;winter solstice.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.sitkanature.org/wordpress/2008/12/26/solstice-sun/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:13:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41321</guid>
      <author>Gwark@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41320) http://www.solarsystemscope.com/</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41320</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.solarsystemscope.com/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Okay, I'm doing the panoramatic view, from New York, and according to&lt;br /&gt;that the sun is in the southwest right now, less than 30 degrees up&lt;br /&gt;from the horizon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is that right?  It seems the sun should be higher at 2pm.  Even at&lt;br /&gt;noon it's only 30 degrees up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:33:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41320</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41319) Space Weather News for Nov. 7, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41319</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Nov. 7, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ASTEROID FLYBY: NASA radars are monitoring 2005 YU55, an asteroid the size of&lt;br /&gt;an aircraft carrier, as it heads for a Nov. 8th flyby of the Earth-Moon system.&lt;br /&gt;There is no danger to our planet. At closest approach on Tuesday at 3:28 pm PST&lt;br /&gt;(23:28 UT), the space rock will be 324,600 kilometers away. Nevertheless,&lt;br /&gt;professional astronomers are eagerly anticipating the flyby as the asteroid&lt;br /&gt;presents an exceptionally strong radar target.  Even amateur astronomers might&lt;br /&gt;be able to photograph it during the hours around closest approach.  Check&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com for observing tips and more information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;OWN YOUR OWN SPACE ROCK: They came from outer space--and you can have one.&lt;br /&gt;Genuine meteorites are now on sale in the Space Weather Store:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.shopspaceweather.com/ownameteorite.aspx&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 03:28:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41319</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41318) NASA Science News for Oct. 24, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41318</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Oct. 24, 2011&lt;br /&gt;NASA's MESSENGER probe has discovered a surprise on Mercury: Something is&lt;br /&gt;digging &amp;quot;hollows&amp;quot; in the surface of the innermost planet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/24oct_s&lt;br /&gt;leepyhollows/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A video version of this story is available at&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqg8PR2mVvc&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:56:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41318</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41317) Space Weather News for Oct. 24, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41317</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Oct. 24, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CME IMPACT: A coronal mass ejection (CME) hit Earth's magnetic field on Oct.&lt;br /&gt;24th around 1800 UT (2 pm EDT).  The impact strongly compressed our planet's&lt;br /&gt;magnetosphere and may have exposed geosynchronous satellites to solar wind&lt;br /&gt;plasma.  Mild to moderate geomagnetic storms are possible in the hours ahead as&lt;br /&gt;Earth's magnetic field continues to reverberate from the hit.  Sky watchers in&lt;br /&gt;Scandinavia, Canada, and northern-tier US States should be alert for auroras,&lt;br /&gt;especially during the hours around local midnight.  Check&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com for updates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WOULD YOU LIKE A CALL when geomagnetic storms are in progress? Storm alerts are&lt;br /&gt;available from http://spaceweathertext.com (text) and&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweatherphone.com (voice).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41317</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41316) Space Weather News for Oct. 21, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41316</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Oct. 21, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WEEKEND METEOR SHOWER: Today Earth is entering a stream of debris from Halley's&lt;br /&gt;comet, source of the annual Orionid meteor shower. Forecasters expect the&lt;br /&gt;shower to peak on Saturday morning, Oct. 22nd, with more than 15 meteors per&lt;br /&gt;hour.  Check http://spaceweather.com for links to a live meteor radar, sky maps&lt;br /&gt;and observing tips.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;MASSIVE SATELLITE NEARS RE-ENTRY: The massive ROSAT X-ray space telescope is&lt;br /&gt;making its final spiralling orbits around Earth. Most experts agree that&lt;br /&gt;re-entry will occur during the early hours of Oct. 23rd over a still-unknown&lt;br /&gt;region of our planet.  Sky watchers report that the descending satellite can be&lt;br /&gt;as bright as a first magnitude star and it occasionally &amp;quot;flares&amp;quot; to even&lt;br /&gt;greater intensity.  For last-chance sightings of ROSAT in your area, please&lt;br /&gt;check SpaceWeather's online satellite tracker (http://spaceweather.com/flybys)&lt;br /&gt;or turn your smartphone into a ROSAT tracker: http://simpleflybys.com .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41316</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41315) NASA Science News for Oct. 20, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41315</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Oct. 20, 2011&lt;br /&gt;Earth is about to pass through a stream of debris from Halley's comet, source&lt;br /&gt;of the annual Orionid meteor shower. Forecasters expect the shower to peak on&lt;br /&gt;Saturday morning, Oct. 22nd, with more than 15 meteors per hour. Earth isn't&lt;br /&gt;the only world in the debris stream; NASA researchers will also be watching for&lt;br /&gt;meteoroid strikes on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/20oct_o&lt;br /&gt;rionids/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:49:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41315</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41314) NASA Science News for Oct. 19, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41314</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Oct. 19, 2011&lt;br /&gt;NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has detected signs of icy bodies raining down in&lt;br /&gt;an alien solar system. The downpour resembles our own solar system several&lt;br /&gt;billion years ago during a period known as the &amp;quot;Late Heavy Bombardment.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/19oct_c&lt;br /&gt;ometstorm/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41314</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41313) Space Weather News for Oct. 14, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41313</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Oct. 14, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ROSAT RE-ENTRY: The ROSAT X-ray observatory, launched in 1990 by NASA and&lt;br /&gt;managed for years by the German Aerospace Center (DLR), will return to Earth&lt;br /&gt;within the next two weeks. Current best estimates place the re-entry between&lt;br /&gt;Oct. 22nd and 24th over an unknown part of Earth. ROSAT will produce a&lt;br /&gt;spectacular fireball when it re-enters, but not all of the satellite will&lt;br /&gt;disintegrate.  According to the DLR, heat-resistant fragments as massive as 1.7&lt;br /&gt;tons could reach Earth's surface.  Check http://spaceweather.com for more&lt;br /&gt;information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LAST-CHANCE SIGHTINGS:  As ROSAT slowly descends it is growing brighter. During&lt;br /&gt;favorable passes, the satellite can now be seen shining as brightly as a first&lt;br /&gt;magnitude star in the night sky.  Local flyby times may be found using&lt;br /&gt;SpaceWeather's Satellite Tracker: http://spaceweather.com/flybys .   Or turn&lt;br /&gt;your smartphone into a ROSAT tracker using our Simple Flybys app:&lt;br /&gt;http://simpleflybys.com .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41313</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41312) Space Weather News for Oct. 7, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41312</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Space Weather News for Oct. 7, 2011&lt;br /&gt;http://spaceweather.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DRACONID METEOR SHOWER: On Saturday, October 8th, Earth will pass through a&lt;br /&gt;network of dusty filaments shed by Comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner. Forecasters&lt;br /&gt;expect the encounter to produce anywhere from a few dozen to a thousand meteors&lt;br /&gt;per hour visible mainly over Europe, northern Africa and the Middle East. The&lt;br /&gt;meteors will stream from the northern constellation Draco--hence their name,&lt;br /&gt;the &amp;quot;Draconids.&amp;quot; Check http://spaceweather.com for full coverage of the event&lt;br /&gt;including observing times and a live audio stream from a meteor radar.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:51:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41312</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41311) Maybe somebody should be assigned to dust off all the comets tha...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41311</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Maybe somebody should be assigned to dust off all the comets that could get&lt;br /&gt;close to Earth? [LAUGHS]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 04:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41311</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Pluck Duck/41310) Im beginning to believe that, for the most part, if you can imag...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41310</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Im beginning to believe that, for the most part, if you can imagine it somehow&lt;br /&gt;existing in the universe, it probably does somewhere out there. ;-P&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:33:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41310</guid>
      <author>Pluck Duck@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41309) NASA Science News for Oct. 4, 2011</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41309</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA Science News for Oct. 4, 2011&lt;br /&gt;Forecasters say Earth is heading for a stream of dust from Comet&lt;br /&gt;21P/Giacobini-Zinner. A close encounter with the comet's fragile debris could&lt;br /&gt;spark a meteor outburst over parts of our planet on October 8th.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FULL STORY at&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/04oct_draconids/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A video version of this story is available at&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNqeftciRFA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:28:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41309</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Erkki/41308) Yeah I love that comparison</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41308</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Yeah I love that comparison&lt;br /&gt;Except that this is a gas giant outside the habitable zone, its just like&lt;br /&gt;Tatooine!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41308</guid>
      <author>Erkki@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Stepwood/41307) It seems that Tatooine is real. NASA has a found a planet that o...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41307</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;It seems that Tatooine is real. NASA has a found a planet that orbits two suns.&lt;br /&gt;More explanation here: http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/tech/2011/09/15/coren-l&lt;br /&gt;aurance-doyle-two-suns-intv.cnn&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41307</guid>
      <author>Stepwood@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41306) The loss of the Russian Soyuz that was taking supplies to the IS...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41306</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;The loss of the Russian Soyuz that was taking supplies to the ISS may lead to&lt;br /&gt;the ISS having to be temporarily evacuated despite earlier claims that the ISS&lt;br /&gt;was well stocked.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:23:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41306</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Darkhaven/41305) wow, how many carots is that?</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41305</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;wow, how many carots is that?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;also, &amp;quot;I don't imagine that a picture of a very shiny object is what we're&lt;br /&gt;looking at here.&amp;quot; so, how much light is the oxygen likely to filter? and what&lt;br /&gt;does radiation (as given off by the pulsar) do to a latice structure? how can a&lt;br /&gt;planet have heavier elements (carbon and oxygen) and not lighter ones like&lt;br /&gt;hydrogen and helium (especially with a radiation source so close that i figure&lt;br /&gt;would break down these elements)? i also noticed they didn't mention it having&lt;br /&gt;any other compounds other than crystol - like co2 - is this because a climate&lt;br /&gt;like this wouldn't allow this bond to form or does a spectrum look the same&lt;br /&gt;with the atoms as it does with the elements?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:28:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41305</guid>
      <author>Darkhaven@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(DesCartes/41304) http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/25/us-planet-diamond-idUS...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41304</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/25/us-planet-diamond-idUSTRE77O69A201108&lt;br /&gt;25&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Diamond planet! Scientists suspect--it's made of carbon and is incredibly&lt;br /&gt;dense.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:22:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41304</guid>
      <author>DesCartes@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Darkhaven/41303) i think this was expected no matter where they went. one would h...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41303</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;i think this was expected no matter where they went. one would hope that people&lt;br /&gt;could do something more productive than just *cry*. that doesn't seem to be the&lt;br /&gt;way people work though.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:07:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41303</guid>
      <author>Darkhaven@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41302) NASA says the process to determine which museums got the shuttle...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41302</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA says the process to determine which museums got the shuttles was not&lt;br /&gt;influenced by politics.&lt;br /&gt;No word yet on the inquiery regarding this as some museums who applied have&lt;br /&gt;cried &amp;quot;Foul!&amp;quot; as they went to east coast museums and 1 west coast museum.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41302</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41301) PG&gt;</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41301</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;PG&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is that?&lt;br /&gt;We went from Lead Acid to NiCad to NiMH to Lithium Ion with each claiming to be&lt;br /&gt;better than the previous ones.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Egregious&amp;gt; Thanks for the reply. From what I have read the batteries will only&lt;br /&gt;be used when extra power is needed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:43:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41301</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41299) Lithium ion batteries need little maintenance.  You can charge o...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41299</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lithium ion batteries need little maintenance.  You can charge or&lt;br /&gt;discharge them however you want and they won't suffer.  That's why&lt;br /&gt;they're so popular.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have a professional on-hand to take care of your batteries,&lt;br /&gt;including their charge/discharge cycles, the other types can&lt;br /&gt;outperform and outlast lithium.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like all engineering decisions, there are trade-offs everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41299</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Peccavimus/41298) Four times: the matter of the battery itself also stores energy,...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41298</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Four times: the matter of the battery itself also stores energy, which can be&lt;br /&gt;released if it undergoes fusion or if it meets an antimatter battery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:25:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41298</guid>
      <author>Peccavimus@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Cyanide/41297) A battery being thrown and hitting someone is a battery 3 times ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41297</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;A battery being thrown and hitting someone is a battery 3 times over. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 05:07:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41297</guid>
      <author>Cyanide@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(DesCartes/41296) And a battery in a gravity well is a battery two times over!</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41296</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;And a battery in a gravity well is a battery two times over!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:35:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41296</guid>
      <author>DesCartes@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Peccavimus/41295) If that's the case, then any object in a gravity well is a batte...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41295</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;If that's the case, then any object in a gravity well is a battery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:26:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41295</guid>
      <author>Peccavimus@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41294) come to think of it, a container of any fuel, for example, could...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41294</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;come to think of it, a container of any fuel, for example, could be called &amp;quot;a&lt;br /&gt;battery&amp;quot; because it has stored energy in it!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41294</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Paladin Grendel/41293) in terms of eneegy density, no. also not as good in terms of bat...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41293</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;in terms of eneegy density, no. also not as good in terms of battery memory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 01:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41293</guid>
      <author>Paladin Grendel@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41292) Since science is involved....</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41292</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Since science is involved....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When speaking of energy storage options (batteries) an article I read only&lt;br /&gt;touched on Lead Acid batteries and then went on and on about Lithium Ion&lt;br /&gt;batteries being superior to Lead Acid batteries.&lt;br /&gt;Why no mention of the pros and cons on NiCad or NMH batteries? Are they viable&lt;br /&gt;options?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:33:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41292</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41291) Antiprotons have been discovered (being annihilated, I assume) t...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41291</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Antiprotons have been discovered (being annihilated, I assume) trapped within&lt;br /&gt;the Van Allen radiation belts. Courtesy the PAMELA detector on a Russian&lt;br /&gt;satellite.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All we need now are dilithium crystals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14405122&lt;br /&gt;http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/1071Bickford.pdf&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41291</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41290) Ah the chip technologies. After I got my Z80 I never had to worr...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41290</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Ah the chip technologies. After I got my Z80 I never had to worry about&lt;br /&gt;MOSFETs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 03:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41290</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(KalTorak/41289) (I was gonna ask that, too; I don't think there's anything in a ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41289</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;(I was gonna ask that, too; I don't think there's anything in a MOSFET that&lt;br /&gt;needs QM to describe it, at least for a big MOSFET.  Now when ya make the gate&lt;br /&gt;oxide a couple atoms thick, different rules clearly do apply.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41289</guid>
      <author>KalTorak@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41288) Cyanide&gt; You described the whole patent issue quite well. Did yo...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41288</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Cyanide&amp;gt; You described the whole patent issue quite well. Did you catch that&lt;br /&gt;segment on NPR?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And I agree, unmanned robotic ships/probes are very useful. The ones we built&lt;br /&gt;in the past are very rugged. More than one of the Pioneers are still working as&lt;br /&gt;are the Voyagers. You cannot say our more current stuff is as rugged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:51:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41288</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41287) Unmanned space vegicle can photograoh quite well those "little g...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41287</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Unmanned space vegicle can photograoh quite well those &amp;quot;little green men&amp;quot; out&lt;br /&gt;there in space, before these people will destroy that &amp;quot;enemy&amp;quot; vehicle&lt;br /&gt; and its contents completely! [LAUGHS] ^vehicles^&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41287</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Cyanide/41286) We have a societal problem. We don't value education. We don't r...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41286</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;We have a societal problem. We don't value education. We don't respect&lt;br /&gt;educators, We don't respect knowledge. We think we know better. If we screw up&lt;br /&gt;it is someone elses fault and the government should bail us out and give us&lt;br /&gt;free hand outs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Who has the most money is more important then who is technically right or can&lt;br /&gt;make a good societal advancement. Corporations don't invent things. Corporate&lt;br /&gt;espionage is a multi-trillion dollar business and they just steal from each&lt;br /&gt;other. Then they lobby congress to make sure what they are doing is legal. Even&lt;br /&gt;if it is ripping off the original inventor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So the bottomline, it isn't what you know, it is who can you steal it from and&lt;br /&gt;that has become our society.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41286</guid>
      <author>Cyanide@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Darkhaven/41285) in the end Giraffe is right. we had better do as much unmanned e...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41285</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;in the end Giraffe is right. we had better do as much unmanned exploration as&lt;br /&gt;we can before we send manned missions to places. because as soon as we start&lt;br /&gt;sending humans there, i'm pretty sure we'll contaminate the environment. as&lt;br /&gt;soon as we colonize the place, we'll destroy the environment. i'm pretty&lt;br /&gt;certain we've left more than foot prints on the moon and we'll do the same to&lt;br /&gt;any other place.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;however, *i* personally want to go to places that aren't earth bount - fuck&lt;br /&gt;mars - i want to go to titan or even pluto. i want to check another earth like&lt;br /&gt;planet in another solar system, i want to live 500 years longer than most&lt;br /&gt;people currently do. but, i might not be able to do this. why? because we don't&lt;br /&gt;have people with the immagination, creativity, and will to make it happen? no.&lt;br /&gt;because richeous fuckers think it's their duty to cut research funding. there&lt;br /&gt;are tons of engineers who would love to work on cool projects (and keep their&lt;br /&gt;homes) and tons more biochemists who might enjoy the same. but, they are either&lt;br /&gt;working on finding any job that pays or reinventing wheels (i'll need a new&lt;br /&gt;$300+ bike wheel soon - err i'll buy one anyway, but is the guy who engineered&lt;br /&gt;it really helping humanity?).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;experimental data is all good. i will never argue against it - fund the allen&lt;br /&gt;array (seti), or finish the atom smasher in texas, or do something. point is,&lt;br /&gt;any way you look at it, this sucks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;oh, and i wonder who will be the new world super power after we loose our aaa&lt;br /&gt;credit rating. maybe it will be a chinese ship that flies me to pluto.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41285</guid>
      <author>Darkhaven@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Tanj/41284) yes, yes. research and the quest for knowledge has been a Good T...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41284</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;yes, yes. research and the quest for knowledge has been a Good Thing. but if&lt;br /&gt;you are asking the general public to cough up bazillions of dollars on it, &lt;br /&gt;then&lt;br /&gt;you better give them something to covet. because they didnt give the number&lt;br /&gt;theorists billions of dollars. in general, they starved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41284</guid>
      <author>Tanj@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(DesCartes/41283) Number theory is an old, old branch of mathematics. (Euclid had ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41283</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Number theory is an old, old branch of mathematics. (Euclid had some number&lt;br /&gt;theory stuff among his works.) It was thought more-or-less useless. (G.H. Hardy&lt;br /&gt;reveled in this; he didn't want any of his work to be used for evil.) Until the&lt;br /&gt;1970s, or so--then number theory became quite practical.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41283</guid>
      <author>DesCartes@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41282) I'm not holding my breath for string theory to "mature."</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41282</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;I'm not holding my breath for string theory to &amp;quot;mature.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41282</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Steppenwolf/41281) My understanding is that QM was necessary to conceive of even th...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41281</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;My understanding is that QM was necessary to conceive of even the original&lt;br /&gt;transistors, but I certainly could be wrong.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But if you like, I think lasers need QM too, don't they? :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:49:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41281</guid>
      <author>Steppenwolf@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41280) We need QM for the scale that transistors are built at now, but ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41280</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;We need QM for the scale that transistors are built at now, but we didn't need&lt;br /&gt;them for the first transistors, did we?  And it was mostly a predictable path&lt;br /&gt;from there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41280</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Steppenwolf/41279) And quantum mechanics led directly to transistors and the integr...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41279</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;And quantum mechanics led directly to transistors and the integrated chip,&lt;br /&gt;which are kind of important these days.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don't knock a field of inquiry till it's mature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:43:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41279</guid>
      <author>Steppenwolf@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Vanity/41278) I dare say the Theory of Relativity appeared to have "zero pract...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41278</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;   I dare say the Theory of Relativity appeared to have &amp;quot;zero practical&lt;br /&gt;applications now or in the future&amp;quot; in 1905.  A hundred years later, the&lt;br /&gt;practical applications are ubiquitous.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41278</guid>
      <author>Vanity@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Vanity/41277) We do exploration because the very *best* way of finding out wha...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41277</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;   We do exploration because the very *best* way of finding out what a strange&lt;br /&gt;place is like is to send people there.  People have been doing this for&lt;br /&gt;millennia.  Robots are a helpful prelude to human exploration, but they're not&lt;br /&gt;an acceptable substitute.  Everything that *all* of our robotic expeditions to&lt;br /&gt;Mars have accomplished could have been done by a small team of humans in a&lt;br /&gt;couple of weeks -- with better and more certain scientific return.  We can only&lt;br /&gt;send robots to answer certain limited questions, and if we didn't think of the&lt;br /&gt;right questions before we sent the robot, we have to send another one.&lt;br /&gt;   We didn't acquire our understanding of the relationship of the Earth and the&lt;br /&gt;Moon (which told us, inter alia, how old the Earth really was) by sending&lt;br /&gt;robots.  Robotic craft just paved the way for human exploration, and it was the&lt;br /&gt;ability of trained scientist-explorers to survey the landscape with educated&lt;br /&gt;eyes, pick out the interesting materials, grab them, and take them home, that&lt;br /&gt;made the difference.  Robots can't do that.  There is absolutely no comparison&lt;br /&gt;between robotic exploration and human exploration; the return of useful data&lt;br /&gt;from the latter is orders of magnitude greater.&lt;br /&gt;   That's why we don't explore Antarctica using rovers.   That's why we don't&lt;br /&gt;send robots to climb mountains. That's why we get our best data on ocean life&lt;br /&gt;from divers, not from remote submersibles. There's absolutely nothing like a&lt;br /&gt;hands-on encounter with the unknown to make sense of it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41277</guid>
      <author>Vanity@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Tanj/41276) that's our deal to the scientists: we will give you hundreds of ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41276</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;that's our deal to the scientists: we will give you hundreds of bilions&lt;br /&gt;of dollars to chase your dreams as long as you also give us the means&lt;br /&gt;to live our dreams: man on another planet.  Yeah, you don't really agree&lt;br /&gt;with our dream (manned space flight), but we don't really agree with yours&lt;br /&gt;(data collection to advance our answers of fundamental questions of&lt;br /&gt;physics), so there ya go.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I mean, look at the ridiculous amount of money that we're spending on&lt;br /&gt;string theory research, which has (as far as I know) zero practical&lt;br /&gt;applications now or in the future (please let me know if I'm wrong).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41276</guid>
      <author>Tanj@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41275) How would you falsify that?</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41275</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How would you falsify that?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41275</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41274) I guess I don't see the urgency that you do to do it right now. ...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41274</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;I guess I don't see the urgency that you do to do it right now. I'd rather we&lt;br /&gt;figured out how to not fuck up one planet before we spread our sentience to&lt;br /&gt;other worlds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41274</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41273) Because I value spreading life and sentience.</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41273</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Because I value spreading life and sentience.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41273</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41272) Why do you want humans on other planets?</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41272</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Why do you want humans on other planets?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:24:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41272</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41271) I want a manned mission for reasons that include more than just</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41271</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I want a manned mission for reasons that include more than just&lt;br /&gt;science, which include gettig humans onto other planets.  I doubt&lt;br /&gt;that NASA has the risk-tolerance for doing that these days, though,&lt;br /&gt;so it keeps on doing these half-assed measures like the ISS, which&lt;br /&gt;don't do good human missions or good science missions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:54:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41271</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Giraffe/41270) Why do you want a manned program?  Manned programs are orders of...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41270</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;Why do you want a manned program?  Manned programs are orders of magnitude more&lt;br /&gt;expensive and result in dead astronauts. Risk of life might be acceptable if&lt;br /&gt;the scientific objective were sufficiently important, but I don't see what that&lt;br /&gt;vital scientific objective might be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41270</guid>
      <author>Giraffe@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(SledgeHammer/41269) NASA didn't lose the Saturn V plans. They're on microfilm. One r...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41269</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;NASA didn't lose the Saturn V plans. They're on microfilm. One reporter gets&lt;br /&gt;lazy, and for the rest of recorded history, people wail the plans are lost.&lt;br /&gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20080517060452/http://www.space.com/news/spacehistor&lt;br /&gt;y/saturn_five_000313.html&lt;br /&gt;or:&lt;br /&gt;http://tinyurl.com/3deq9qa&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41269</guid>
      <author>SledgeHammer@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Egregious/41268) The Space Shuttle wasn't expensive because of fuel costs.  It wa...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41268</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Space Shuttle wasn't expensive because of fuel costs.  It was&lt;br /&gt;expensive because of labor.  Unless/until the market demand&lt;br /&gt;increases, cutting costs _has_ to mean cutting jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I want a manned program, but NASA doesn't seem capable of running&lt;br /&gt;one.  They do a bang-up job on their unmanned stuff, though.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41268</guid>
      <author>Egregious@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(QUITTNER/41266) As long as politicians cannot or don't want to raise enough mone...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41266</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;As long as politicians cannot or don't want to raise enough money by raising&lt;br /&gt;taxation rates, and there is therefore a shortage of money, and that therefore&lt;br /&gt;many cuts will have to be made (very painfully), I am not surprised that NASA&lt;br /&gt;is to be cut severely or completely. Blame the politicians for that, and&lt;br /&gt;ultimately blame the voters who voted these politicians into power over the&lt;br /&gt;past very many years with continual deficits.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41266</guid>
      <author>QUITTNER@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Gespalder/41265) I had heard that the EU and Japan are looking to get more into t...</title>
      <link>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41265</link>
      <description>&lt;pre&gt;I had heard that the EU and Japan are looking to get more into the game with&lt;br /&gt;supply missions and maybe future astronaut missions. No idea how far off any of&lt;br /&gt;that is though. Also, India has expressed some interest and of course we all&lt;br /&gt;know China's plans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 14:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://rss.iscabbs.com/forums/67/read/41265</guid>
      <author>Gespalder@rss.iscabbs.com</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

